Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,110

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America

Pagiola, Stefano, Arcenas, Agustin, Platais, Gunars·2005·World Development

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Alderman, 1998, The potential and limitations of self-targeted food subsidies, World Bank Research Observer, 13, 213, 10.1093/wbro/13.2.213 · doi:10.1093/wbro/13.2.213
  2. Barret, 2003, How Accurate is food-for-work self-targeting in the presence of imperfect factor markets? Evidence from Ethiopia, Journal of Development Studies, 39, 152, 10.1080/00220380412331333189 · DOI
  3. Bigman, 2000, Geographical targeting for poverty alleviation: an introduction to the special issue, The World Bank Economic Review, 14, 129, 10.1093/wber/14.1.129 · DOI
  4. Carter, 1984, Identification of the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: an empirical analysis of peasant agriculture production, Oxford Economic Papers, 36, 131, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041621 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Castro, E. (2001). Costarrican experience in the charge for hydro environmental services of the biodiversity to finance conservation and recuperation of hillside ecosystems. Paper presented at the international workshop on market creation for biodiversity products and services, OECD, Paris, January 25–26, 2001
  6. Coady, 2004, Targeting outcomes redux, World Bank Research Observer, 19, 61, 10.1093/wbro/lkh016 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Heath, 1996, Natural resource degradation effects of poverty and population growth are largely policy-induced: The case of Colombia, Environment and Development Economics, 1, 65, 10.1017/S1355770X00000383 · DOI
  8. Kerr, 2002, Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India, World Development, 30, 1387, 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00042-6 · DOI
  9. Nowak, 1987, The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies: economic and diffusion explanations, Rural Sociology, 52, 208
  10. Pattanayak, 2003, Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies, Agroforestry Systems, 57, 173, 10.1023/A:1024809108210 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Scherr, 1995, Economic factors in farmer adoption of agroforestry: patterns observed in western Kenya, World Development, 23, 787, 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00005-W · DOI · Paper page
  12. Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., & Strappazzon, L. (2002). Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria’ BushTender Trial. Paper presented at the 46th Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Conference, Canberra, February 13–15, 2003
  13. Weitzman, 1974, Prices vs. quantities, The Review of Economic Studies, 41, 477, 10.2307/2296698 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,110

Metadata

Authors
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G.
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
237-253
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077742508
Cited by
1,110
References
1
FWCI
38.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.