Not all supply chains are created equal: The linkages between soy local trade relations and development outcomes in Brazil
Open accessAbstract
Global agricultural trade is a key driver of socioenvironmental transformations in rural areas, including development dynamics. By creating revenue and wealth opportunities, it influences the economic and social relations in a landscape. However, not all landscapes shaped by a given agricultural sector are the same: one variable is how supply chain actors and their embedded networks (including commodity traders, farmers, and input suppliers) develop, maintain, or shift relationship patterns over time. To explore the connections between development and the nature of such trade relationships, particularly between farmers and commodity traders, we take soy as an emblematic example and compare four different municipalities in Brazil. The contrasting cases are Passo Fundo (RS), an old soy-growing area in Brazil’s South, in a consolidated agricultural region with relatively persistent relationships between farmers and commodity traders; Sorriso (MT), in a more recently occupied agricultural region in the country’s Center-West, with relatively low persistence of supply-chain relations; Balsas (MA), a place with persistent supply-chain relations in the so-called Matopiba agricultural expansion frontier; and Bom Jesus (PI), also a frontier municipality but having less persistent relations. We build on quantitative assessments of supply-chain stickiness in those four municipalities, which is understood as the persistence of those commercial relationships in contrast to volatility. Anal…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Brazilian Amazon frontier becomes fully integrated into the formal market economy as well as in a globalized and increasingly consolidated agri-food system, where a few traders dominate.
“It becomes fully integrated into the formal market economy as well as in a globalized and increasingly consolidated agri-food system, where a few traders dominate (Graesser et al., 2015;Reis et al., 2024).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Reis et al., 2024
Cites
Global production networks and the analysis of economic development
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290210150842 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J., & Kastner, T. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab0d41 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system
Clapp, J. (2021) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00297-7 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Multiple pathways of commodity crop expansion in tropical forest landscapes
Meyfroidt, P., Carlson, K. M., Fagan, M. E., Gutiérrez-Vélez, V. H., Macedo, M. N., Curran, L. M., DeFries, R. S., Dyer, G. A., Gibbs, H. K., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2014) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074012 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Reis, T. N. P. D., Bastos Lima, M. G., Russo Lopes, G., & Meyfroidt, P.
- Affiliations
- Global Canopy (GB)
- Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 175
- Pages
- 106475
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389503205
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- World Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (765408)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
- Keywords
- soy supply chain, agricultural trade, social trust, lock-in effect, Matopiba, rural development, wealth distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review