Cited by 15Agriculture and Agroindustry StudiesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentRural Development and Agriculture

Not all supply chains are created equal: The linkages between soy local trade relations and development outcomes in Brazil

Open access
Reis, Tiago N.P. dos, Bastos Lima, Mairon G., Russo Lopes, Gabriela, Meyfroidt, Patrick·2024·World Development

Abstract

Global agricultural trade is a key driver of socioenvironmental transformations in rural areas, including development dynamics. By creating revenue and wealth opportunities, it influences the economic and social relations in a landscape. However, not all landscapes shaped by a given agricultural sector are the same: one variable is how supply chain actors and their embedded networks (including commodity traders, farmers, and input suppliers) develop, maintain, or shift relationship patterns over time. To explore the connections between development and the nature of such trade relationships, particularly between farmers and commodity traders, we take soy as an emblematic example and compare four different municipalities in Brazil. The contrasting cases are Passo Fundo (RS), an old soy-growing area in Brazil’s South, in a consolidated agricultural region with relatively persistent relationships between farmers and commodity traders; Sorriso (MT), in a more recently occupied agricultural region in the country’s Center-West, with relatively low persistence of supply-chain relations; Balsas (MA), a place with persistent supply-chain relations in the so-called Matopiba agricultural expansion frontier; and Bom Jesus (PI), also a frontier municipality but having less persistent relations. We build on quantitative assessments of supply-chain stickiness in those four municipalities, which is understood as the persistence of those commercial relationships in contrast to volatility. Anal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106475

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Reis, T. N. P. D., Bastos Lima, M. G., Russo Lopes, G., & Meyfroidt, P.
Affiliations
  • Global Canopy (GB)
  • Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
175
Pages
106475
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389503205
Cited by
15
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (765408)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
Keywords
soy supply chain, agricultural trade, social trust, lock-in effect, Matopiba, rural development, wealth distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review