Cited by 124Migration and Labor DynamicsGlobal Health Workforce IssuesMigration, Identity, and Health

Divergent development, racialised rights: globalised labour markets and the trade of nurses—The case of the Philippines

Ball, Rochelle E·2004·Women's Studies International Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wsif.2004.06.003

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ball, R. E.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Ball, Rochelle E
Venue
Women's Studies International Forum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
119-133
ISSN
0277-5395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086610441
Cited by
124
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
21.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Women s Studies International Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Identity, and Health
Keywords
nurse migration, skilled migration, Filipino nurses, globalization, human rights, healthcare workforce, labor market, Philippines, United States, Saudi Arabia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review