Cited by 70Computational Drug Discovery MethodsGene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

A community challenge for a pancancer drug mechanism of action inference from perturbational profile data

Open access
Douglass, Eugene F., Allaway, Robert J., Szalai, Bence, Wang, Wenyu, Tian, Tingzhong, Fernández-Torras, Adrià, Realubit, Ron, Karan, Charles +20 more·2022·Cell Reports Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The Columbia Cancer Target Discovery and Development (CTD2) Center is developing PANACEA, a resource comprising dose-responses and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) profiles of 25 cell lines perturbed with ∼400 clinical oncology drugs, to study a tumor-specific drug mechanism of action. Here, this resource serves as the basis for a DREAM Challenge assessing the accuracy and sensitivity of computational algorithms for de novo drug polypharmacology predictions. Dose-response and perturbational profiles for 32 kinase inhibitors are provided to 21 teams who are blind to the identity of the compounds. The teams are asked to predict high-affinity binding targets of each compound among ∼1,300 targets cataloged in DrugBank. The best performing methods leverage gene expression profile similarity analysis as well as deep-learning methodologies trained on individual datasets. This study lays the foundation for future integrative analyses of pharmacogenomic data, reconciliation of polypharmacology effects in different tumor contexts, and insights into network-based assessments of drug mechanisms of action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100492

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglass, E. F., Allaway, R. J., Szalai, B., Wang, W., Tian, T., Fernández-Torras, A., Realubit, R., Karan, C., Zheng, S., Pessia, A., Tanoli, Z., Jafari, M., Wan, F., Li, S., Xiong, Y., Duran-Frigola, M., Bertoni, M., Badia-i-Mompel, P., Mateo, L., Guitart-Pla, O., Chung, V., Tang, J., Zeng, J., Aloy, P., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Guinney, J., Gerhard, D. S., & Califano, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Sage Bionetworks (US)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Institute for Research in Biomedicine (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Califano, Andrea
Venue
Cell Reports Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
100492
ISSN
2666-3791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206377455
Cited by
68
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (101003633)
  • European Research Council (614944)
  • K. Albin Johanssons Stiftelse (332454)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Engineering Research Centers
  • Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (460044)
  • China Scholarship Council
  • National Institutes of Health (716063, S10-OD012351, S10-OD021764, U01-CA217862)
  • Academy of Finland (317680)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (001-P-001647, 001-P-001682)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BIO2016-77038-R)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
mechanism of action, polypharmacology, kinase inhibitors, drug target prediction, dose-response relationship, RNA-seq, DREAM challenge, panacea, gene expression similarity, deep learning, pharmacogenomics, drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Neoplasms, Protein Kinases, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Neural Networks, Computer, Gene Expression Profiling, Polypharmacology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review