Cited by 37Epilepsy research and treatmentTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Treatment of depression in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: A pilot study of cognitive behavioral therapy vs. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Orjuela-Rojas, Juan Manuel, Martínez-Juárez, Iris E., Ruiz-Chow, Angel, Crail-Melendez, Daniel·2015·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

There is a high prevalence of depression in patients with epilepsy, which negatively impacts their quality of life (QOL) and seizure control. Currently, the first-line of treatment for depression in patients with epilepsy is based on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The main objective of this pilot study was to compare cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) versus SSRIs for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Seven patients who received group CBT were compared with eight patients treated with SSRIs. All were diagnosed with MDD and TLE. Patients were assessed at baseline before treatment and at six and 12weeks during treatment with the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Scale of 31 items (QOLIE 31), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Seizure records were also taken on a monthly basis. After 12weeks of treatment, both groups showed improved QOL and reduced severity of depression symptoms. There were no statistically significant group differences in the final scores for the BDI (p=0.40) and QOLIE 31 (p=0.72), although the effect size on QOL was higher for the group receiving CBT. In conclusion, the present study suggests that both CBT and SSRIs may improve MDD and QOL in patients with TLE. We found no significant outcome differences between both treatment modalities. These findings support further study using a double-blind controlled design to demonstrate the efficacy of CBT and SSRIs in the treatment of MDD and QOL in patients with TLE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.07.033

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orjuela-Rojas, J. M., Martínez-Juárez, I. E., Ruiz-Chow, A., & Crail-Melendez, D.
Affiliations
Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía (MX)
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
51
Pages
176-181
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1921727148
Cited by
37
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Neuropsychiatry
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, temporal lobe epilepsy, cognitive behavioral therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, major depressive disorder, quality of life, seizure control, psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review