Cited by 65Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsEpilepsy research and treatment

Cognitive behavior therapy for depression in people with epilepsy: A systematic review

Open access
Gandy, Milena, Sharpe, Louise, Perry, Kathryn Nicholson·2013·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a recommended treatment for depression in people with epilepsy (PWE); however, a recent C ochrane review found that there was insufficient evidence that any psychological therapy is effective. This conclusion provides little help to clinicians who provide interventions for depressed PWE. The aim of this review was to systematically and qualitatively review the literature on the efficacy of CBT for depression in PWE based on randomized controlled trials (RCT s) and case series. We aim to determine patterns in the literature to inform the type of CBT, if any, that should be offered to PWE who are depressed. Databases MEDLINE,P syc INFO, and the C ochrane EBM Reviews were searched via OVID. Selection criteria included the following: (1) participants with epilepsy; (2) use of CBT; (3) valid depression outcome measure; and (4) published in peer‐reviewed journal in E nglish. Inclusions of studies were assessed by two independent researchers. We identified 14 outcome papers for 13 CBT trials including 6 randomized controlled trials (RCT s) and 7 case series. Positive effects of CBT on depression were reported in three of six RCT s. A review of their content revealed that all effective RCT s specifically tailored CBT to improve depression. Conversely, two of three RCT s that failed to find depression‐related effects focused on improving seizure‐control. This pattern was also observed in the case series. Although limited in number and having methodologic limitations, the treatment studies included in our review suggest that interventions tailored toward improving depression are possibly efficacious, whereas those that focus on improving seizure control do not appear to be. However, this review highlights that there is need for further RCT s in this area in order to confirm the possible efficacy of CBT for depression in PWE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.12345

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over the past decade, additional trials with substantially improved designs have become available that have been critically appraised in recent reviews, providing growing evidence for positive effects of psychological treatments on wider HRQoL, psychiatric symptoms, psychological functioning, and seizure control in people with epilepsy.

    “Over the past decade, additional trials with substantially improved designs have become available that have been critically appraised in a number of recent reviews, 16,18 providing growing evidence for the positive effects of psychological treatments on wider HRQoL, psychiatric symptoms (ie, anxiety, depression), psychological functioning (ie, self-management), and seizure control in PWE.”

    From Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of psychological treatments for people with epilepsy on health-related quality of life (2018) · cites this paper as [18]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This review is in keeping with a systematic review of cognitive behavior therapy for depression in PWE that suggested interventions tailored toward improving depression are possibly efficacious.

    “this review is in keeping with a systematic review of cognitive behavior therapy for depression in PWE 18 that suggested interventions tailored toward improving depression are possibly efficacious.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gandy, M., Sharpe, L., & Perry, K. N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Gandy, Milena
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-03
Volume
54
Issue
10
Pages
1725-1734
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1975643987
Cited by
65
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Epilepsy Society of Australia
  • Epilepsy Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, epilepsy, treatment efficacy, seizure control
MeSH terms
Depression, Epilepsy, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review