Cited by 17Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and CortisolAvian ecology and behavior

Non-invasive monitoring of adrenocortical activity in captive African penguin (Spheniscus demersus) by measuring faecal glucocorticoid metabolites

Open access
Ozella, L., Anfossi, L., Di Nardo, F., Pessani, D.·2015·General and Comparative Endocrinology

Abstract

Measurement of faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs) has become a useful and widely-accepted method for the non-invasive evaluation of stress in vertebrates. In this study we assessed the adrenocortical activity of five captive African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) by means of FGM evaluation following a biological stressor, i.e. capture and immobilization. In addition, we detected individual differences in secretion of FGMs during a stage of the normal biological cycle of penguins, namely the breeding period, without any external or induced causes of stress. Our results showed that FGM concentrations peaked 5.5-8h after the induced stress in all birds, and significantly decreased within 30 h. As predictable, the highest peak of FGMs (6591 ng/g) was reached by the youngest penguin, which was at its first experience with the stressor. This peak was 1.8-2.7-fold higher compared to those of the other animals habituated to the stimulus. For the breeding period, our results revealed that the increase in FGMs compared to ordinary levels, and the peaks of FGMs, varied widely depending on the age and mainly on the reproductive state of the animal. The bird which showed the lowest peak (2518 ng/g) was an old male that was not in a reproductive state at the time of the study. Higher FGM increases and peaks were reached by the two birds which were brooding (male: 5552%, 96,631 ng/g; female: 1438%, 22,846 ng/g) and by the youngest bird (1582%, 39,700 ng/g). The impact of the reproductive state on FGM levels was unexpected compared to that produced by the induced stress. The EIA used in this study to measure FGM levels proved to be a reliable tool for assessing individual and biologically-relevant changes in FGM concentrations in African Penguin. Moreover, this method allowed detection of physiological stress during the breeding period, and identification of individual differences in relation to the reproductive status. The increase in FGM levels as a response to capture and immobilization suggests that the measured metabolites are appropriate indicators of adrenal activity in these birds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.06.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1.  Birke, L., 2002. Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang-utans. Anim. Welf. 11(2), 189-202.
  2.  Brunton, D.H., 1990. The Effects of Nesting Stage, Sex, and Type of Predator on Parental Defense by Killdeer (Charadrius vociferous): Testing Models of Avian Parental Defense. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26(3), 181-190.
  3.  Cockrem, J.F., 2007, Stress, corticosterone responses and avian personalities. J. Ornithol. 148 (2), 169-178.
  4.  Coradello, M.A., Morais, R.N., Roper, J., Spercoski, K.M., Massuda, T., Nogueira, S.S.C., Nogueira-Filho, S.L.G., 2012. Validation of a fecal glucocorticoid metabolite assay for collared peccaries (Pecari tajacu). J. Zoo Wild. Med. 43(2), 275-282.
  5.  Crawford, R.J.M., Kemper J., Underhill, L.G., 2013. African Penguin, Spheniscus demersus, in: Garcia Borboroglu, P., Boersma, P. D (Eds.) Penguins: natural history and conservation, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, pp. 211-231.
  6. Davey, G., 2007. Visitors' Effects on the Welfare of Animals in the Zoo: A Review. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci. 10(2), 169-183.
  7.  Garamszegi, L.Z., Eens, M., Török, J., 2008. Birds reveal their personality when singing. PLoS ONE 3, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002647. · DOI
  8.  Goymann W., Möstl, E., Gwinner E., 2002. Corticosterone Metabolites can be Measured Noninvasively in Excreta of European Stonechats (Saxicola torquata rubicola). Auk 119(4), 1167-1173.
  9. Keay, J.M., Singht J., Gaunt, M.C., Kaur, T., 2006. Fecal glucocorticoids and their metabolites as indicators of stress in various mammalian species: a literature review. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 37(3), 234-244.
  10.  Ludders, J.W., Langenberg, J.A., Czekala, N.M., Hollis, N.E., 2001. Fecal Corticosterone Reflects Serum Corticosterone in Florida Sandhill Cranes. J. Wildl. Dis. 37(3), 646- 652.
  11.  Munck, A., Guyre, P.M., Holbrook N.J., 1984. Physiological functions of glucocorticoids in stress and their relation to pharmacological actions. Endocr. Rev. 5(1), 25-44.
  12. Quinn, J., Cresswell, W., 2005. Personality, anti-predation behaviour and behavioural plasticity in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Behaviour 142(9), 1377-1402.
  13. Terio, K.A., Citino, S.B., Brown, J.L., 1999. Fecal cortisol metabolite analysis for noninvasive monitoring of adrenocortical function in the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 30(4), 484-491.
  14.  Warham, J., 1990. The petrels: the behaviour, population biology and physiology. Academic Press, London.
  15.  Wasser, S.K., Kennet B., King G., Hanson E., 1997. Noninvasive physiological measure of disturbance in the Northern Spotted Owl. Conserv. Biol. 11(4), 1019-1022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozella, L., Anfossi, L., Di Nardo, F., & Pessani, D.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Ozella, L.
Venue
General and Comparative Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
224
Pages
104-112
ISSN
0016-6480 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W779716766
Cited by
17
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General and Comparative Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
African penguin, Spheniscus demersus, fecal glucocorticoid metabolites, adrenocortical function, physiological stress, breeding season, reproductive status, age differences, individual differences, non-invasive stress monitoring, enzyme immunoassay
MeSH terms
Animals, Breeding, Feces, Female, Glucocorticoids, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Male, Reproduction, Stress, Physiological, Spheniscidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review