Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophages, inflammation and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) progression—Clinicopathological correlation

HAMMES, L, TEKMAL, R, NAUD, P, EDELWEISS, M, KIRMA, N, VALENTE, P, SYRJANEN, K, CUNHAFILHO, J·2007·Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the population of macrophages during the cervical malignant transformation and its influence in CIN outcome. Methods Biopsies from 26 normal cervix, 28 low-grade (LSIL), 30 high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and 28 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) were stained by H&E to assess inflammation and by immunohistochemistry with anti-CD68 to detect macrophages. The macrophage count was corrected for the epithelial and stromal compartments using appropriate software. Clinical and prospective follow-up data were also available. Results We identified that macrophage count increased linearly with disease progression (median count per case at x200 magnification: normal, 5.1; LSIL, 5.5; HSIL, 9.9; SCC, 14.5; P Conclusions The study on macrophages offers a potential approach for cervical cancer treatment, since macrophages are closely related to progression of CIN, and can be used as an applicable marker of such a risk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.11.023

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
HAMMES, L., TEKMAL, R., NAUD, P., EDELWEISS, M., KIRMA, N., VALENTE, P., SYRJANEN, K., & CUNHAFILHO, J.
Venue
Gynecologic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
157-165
ISSN
0090-8258
Cited by
116
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review