Cited by 132Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Fear recognition across the menstrual cycle

Pearson, Rebecca, Lewis, Michael B.·2005·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

This study assesses the mediating role of stage of menstrual cycle in the recognition of emotional expressions. It was hypothesised that fear recognition ability would be stronger at high-oestrogen stages of the menstrual cycle. The accuracy of recognising emotional expressions was compared across 50 women who were at different stages of their menstrual cycle. It was found that accuracy to recognise emotions was significantly affected by the interaction between stages of the menstrual cycle and the emotion being displayed. Further analysis revealed that for the emotion expression of fear alone, participants were significantly more accurate at the preovulatory surge (highest oestrogen levels) than at menstruation (oestrogen levels at lowest point). The results have implications for the processes that underlie fear processing and a possible insight into the sexual dimorphism of this ability and conditions that show variations in fear recognition (e.g., autism, Turner syndrome).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phase in the menstrual cycle has important effects on emotional responding.

    “Third, phase in menstrual cycle has been shown to have important effects on emotional responding (Amin, Epperson, Constable, & Canli, 2006; Goldstein et al., 2005; Pearson & Lewis, 2005; Protopopescu et al., 2005).”

    From Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal (2008) · cites this paper as Pearson & Lewis, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, R., & Lewis, M. B.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Michael B.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
267-271
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011520426
Cited by
132
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
fear recognition, menstrual cycle, estrogen, emotional expression recognition, sex differences, preovulatory surge, menstruation, fear processing, autism spectrum disorder, Turner syndrome
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Estrogens, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Follicular Phase, Humans, Luteal Phase, Menstrual Cycle, Menstruation, Ovulation, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review