Cited by 51Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Exposure to bisphenol-A affects fear memory and histone acetylation of the hippocampus in adult mice

Zhang, Qin, Xu, Xiaohong, Li, Tao, Lu, Yang, Ruan, Qin, Lu, Yingjun, Wang, Qinwen, Dong, Fangni +2 more·2014·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Bisphenol-A (BPA), an environmental endocrine disruptor, has been reported to possess weak estrogenic, anti-estrogenic, and anti-androgen properties. Previous evidence indicates that perinatal exposure to low levels of BPA affects anxiety-like and cognitive behaviors in adult rodents. The present study aims to investigate the effect of BPA on emotional memory using the contextual fear conditioning of male mice in adulthood exposed to BPA for 90days. The results indicated that exposure to BPA increased the freezing time 1h and 24h after fear conditioning training. Furthermore, western blot analyses showed that BPA exposure decreased the level of N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor subunit NR1 and increased the expression of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) before fear conditioning training in the hippocampus of male mice. One and twenty-four hours after fear conditioning training, BPA enhanced the changes of the expressions of NR1, phosphorylated extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK1/2), and histone acetylation induced by contextual fear conditioning in the hippocampus. These results suggest that long term exposure to BPA enhanced fear memory by the concomitant increased level of NMDA receptor and/or the enhanced histone acetylation in the hippocampus, which may be associated with activation of ERK1/2 signaling pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.12.004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Q., Xu, X., Li, T., Lu, Y., Ruan, Q., Lu, Y., Wang, Q., Dong, F., Yang, Y., & Zhang, G.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
  • Ningbo University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Xiaohong
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
106-113
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083045176
Cited by
51
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology (201304)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81172627)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Z2090955)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors, fear memory, contextual fear conditioning, histone acetylation, HDAC2, NMDA receptor NR1, ERK signaling, hippocampus, long-term exposure, anxiety-like behavior
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Acetylation, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Benzhydryl Compounds, Conditioning, Psychological, Estrogens, Non-Steroidal, Fear, Hippocampus, Histones, Male, Memory, Mice, Inbred ICR, Phenols, Phosphorylation, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review