Cited by 20Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentOrganizational Management and Innovation

The value of creativity: A scoping review

Open access
Oppert, Michelle Leanne, O'Keeffe, Valerie, Bensnes, Markus Søbstad, Grecu, Alin L., Cropley, David H.·2023·Journal of Creativity

Abstract

Growing rhetoric from industry-based white papers and global reports states that creativity is a vital skill for the future of work. However, despite centuries of study and debate, there remains a lack of consensus on the exact nature of the value of creativity. This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines with the objective of reviewing and describing the literature since 1980 to find a consensus description of the value of creativity. This review identifies a three-factor typology comprising extrinsic, instrumental, and intrinsic-inherent value as value construct propositions. The synthesis of the reviewed literature (N = 86), including a high Cohen's Kappa for interrater agreement on the articles (κ = 0.993), found that the value of creativity is predominantly instrumental and functions as a tool for achieving both extrinsic and intrinsic-inherent outcomes. This review sharpens the understanding of creativity, primarily in the subject matter area of business and workforce, by creating a value-informed basis that may be valuable for practitioners, scholars, and policymakers responsible for bolstering the rationale for a renewed focus on creativity as a vital 21st Century skill. Future research and limitations are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100059

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oppert, M. L., O'Keeffe, V., Bensnes, M. S., Grecu, A. L., & Cropley, D. H.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • American University of Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Oppert, Michelle Leanne
Venue
Journal of Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
100059
ISSN
2713-3745 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4379259024
Cited by
19
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Creativity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Australian Government Department of Education and Training
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
Keywords
value of creativity, creativity, instrumental values, extrinsic value, intrinsic value, future of work, 21st century skills, labor force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review