Cited by 175Organizational Management and InnovationCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceManagement and Organizational Practices

Organizational Climates for Creativity.

Cummings, L.·1965·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

The characteristics associated with the creative individual and the identification of these characteristics have been explored in a companion paper in this Journal.1 Once this important task has be...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/254790

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cummings, L.
Affiliations
Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Cummings, L.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1965-09-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
220-227
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2314042161
Cited by
175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
Keywords
organizational climate, creativity, creative individuals, organizational characteristics, employee creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review