The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of modular, synthetic scaffolds for improved production of glucaric acid in engineered E. coli
Open accessAbstract
The field of metabolic engineering has the potential to produce a wide variety of chemicals in both an inexpensive and ecologically-friendly manner. Heterologous expression of novel combinations of enzymes promises to provide new or improved synthetic routes towards a substantially increased diversity of small molecules. Recently, we constructed a synthetic pathway to produce d-glucaric acid, a molecule that has been deemed a "top-value added chemical" from biomass, starting from glucose. Limiting flux through the pathway is the second recombinant step, catalyzed by myo-inositol oxygenase (MIOX), whose activity is strongly influenced by the concentration of the myo-inositol substrate. To synthetically increase the effective concentration of myo-inositol, polypeptide scaffolds were built from protein-protein interaction domains to co-localize all three pathway enzymes in a designable complex as previously described (Dueber et al., 2009). Glucaric acid titer was found to be strongly affected by the number of scaffold interaction domains targeting upstream Ino1 enzymes, whereas the effect of increased numbers of MIOX-targeted domains was much less significant. We determined that the scaffolds directly increased the specific MIOX activity and that glucaric acid titers were strongly correlated with MIOX activity. Overall, we observed an approximately 5-fold improvement in product titers over the non-scaffolded control, and a 50% improvement over the previously reported highest titers. These results further validate the utility of these synthetic scaffolds as a tool for metabolic engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Werpy, T., & Petersen, G. (2004) · doi:10.2172/15008859 · Cited by 3,201
Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast
Ro, D.-K., Paradise, E. M., Ouellet, M., Fisher, K. J., Newman, K. L., Ndungu, J. M., Ho, K. A., Eachus, R. A., Ham, T. S., Kirby, J., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04640 · Cited by 2,805
Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels
Atsumi, S., Hanai, T., & Liao, J. C. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06450 · Cited by 1,945
Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids
Martin, V. J. J., Pitera, D. J., Withers, S. T., Newman, J. D., & Keasling, J. D. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt833 · Cited by 1,725
Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains
Pawson, T., & Nash, P. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083653 · Cited by 1,422
Synthetic protein scaffolds provide modular control over metabolic flux
Dueber, J. E., Wu, G. C., Malmirchegini, G. R., Moon, T. S., Petzold, C. J., Ullal, A. V., Prather, K. L. J., & Keasling, J. D. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1557 · Cited by 1,242
Self-citationTuning genetic control through promoter engineering
Alper, H., Fischer, C., Nevoigt, E., & Stephanopoulos, G. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504604102 · Cited by 893
Microbial production of organic acids: expanding the markets
Sauer, M., Porro, D., Mattanovich, D., & Branduardi, P. (2008) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.006 · Cited by 858
Metabolic engineering for the microbial production of 1,3-propanediol
Nakamura, C. E., & Whited, G. M. (2003) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2003.08.005 · Cited by 808
Cited by
Biorefineries for the production of top building block chemicals and their derivatives
Choi, S., Song, C. W., Shin, J. H., & Lee, S. Y. (2015) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.12.007 · Cited by 516
Application of artificial scaffold systems in microbial metabolic engineering
Liu, N., Dong, W., Yang, H., Li, J.-H., & Chiu, T.-Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1328141 · Cited by 16
Johnson, E. R., Kennedy, N. W., Mills, C. E., Liang, S., Chandrasekar, S., Nichols, T. M., Rybnicky, G. A., & Tullman-Ercek, D. (2025) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00962-24 · Cited by 4
Fluorescent Biosensor-Guided Engineering of Enzyme Cascades for Electrochemical Applications
Ricks, N. J., Brachi, M., Arun, F., Baiarashov, E., Minteer, S. D., & Hammond, M. C. (2026) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5c08170 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Moon, T. S., Dueber, J. E., Shiue, E., & Prather, K. L. J.
- Venue
- Metabolic Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 298-305
- ISSN
- 1096-7176 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970762019
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of modular, synthetic scaffolds for improved production of glucaric acid in engineered E. coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymben.2010.01.003
- The paper
- Moon, T. S., Dueber, J. E., Shiue, E., & Prather, K. L. J. (2010). Use of modular, synthetic scaffolds for improved production of glucaric acid in engineered E. coli. Metabolic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2010.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.