The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microscale thermophoresis quantifies biomolecular interactions under previously challenging conditions
Open accessAbstract
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) allows for quantitative analysis of protein interactions in free solution and with low sample consumption. The technique is based on thermophoresis, the directed motion of molecules in temperature gradients. Thermophoresis is highly sensitive to all types of binding-induced changes of molecular properties, be it in size, charge, hydration shell or conformation. In an all-optical approach, an infrared laser is used for local heating, and molecule mobility in the temperature gradient is analyzed via fluorescence. In standard MST one binding partner is fluorescently labeled. However, MST can also be performed label-free by exploiting intrinsic protein UV-fluorescence. Despite the high molecular weight ratio, the interaction of small molecules and peptides with proteins is readily accessible by MST. Furthermore, MST assays are highly adaptable to fit to the diverse requirements of different biomolecules, such as membrane proteins to be stabilized in solution. The type of buffer and additives can be chosen freely. Measuring is even possible in complex bioliquids like cell lysate allowing close to in vivo conditions without sample purification. Binding modes that are quantifiable via MST include dimerization, cooperativity and competition. Thus, its flexibility in assay design qualifies MST for analysis of biomolecular interactions in complex experimental settings, which we herein demonstrate by addressing typically challenging types of binding events from various fields of life science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PIP2and Proteins: Interactions, Organization, and Information Flow
McLaughlin, S., Wang, J., Gambhir, A., & Murray, D. (2002) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.31.082901.134259 · Cited by 837
Cited by
Chen, F., Liu, H., Sun, H., Pan, P., Li, Y., Li, D., & Hou, T. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp03670h · Cited by 455
Quercetin as an Antiviral Agent Inhibits Influenza A Virus (IAV) Entry
Wu, W., Li, R., Li, X., He, J., Jiang, S., Liu, S., & Yang, J. (2015) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v8010006 · Cited by 425
Biophysics in drug discovery: impact, challenges and opportunities
Renaud, J.-P., Chung, C.-W., Danielson, U. H., Egner, U., Hennig, M., Hubbard, R. E., & Nar, H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.123 · Cited by 382
Burguillos, M. A., Svensson, M., Schulte, T., Boza-Serrano, A., Garcia-Quintanilla, A., Kavanagh, E., Santiago, M., Viceconte, N., Oliva-Martin, M. J., Osman, A. M., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.012 · Cited by 365
Rationally designed BCL6 inhibitors target activated B cell diffuse large B cell lymphoma
Cardenas, M. G., Yu, W., Beguelin, W., Teater, M. R., Geng, H., Goldstein, R. L., Oswald, E., Hatzi, K., Yang, S.-N., Cohen, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci85795 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Seidel, S. A. I., Dijkman, P. M., Lea, W. A., van den Bogaart, G., Jerabek-Willemsen, M., Lazic, A., Joseph, J. S., Srinivasan, P., Baaske, P., Simeonov, A., Katritch, I., Melo, F. A., Ladbury, J. E., Schreiber, G., Watts, A., Braun, D., & Duhr, S.
- Venue
- Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-315
- ISSN
- 1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133693793
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.