The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome data
Open accessAbstract
The transcriptome of single cells can reveal important information about cellular states and heterogeneity within populations of cells. Recently, single-cell RNA-sequencing has facilitated expression profiling of large numbers of single cells in parallel. To fully exploit these data, it is critical that suitable computational approaches are developed. One key challenge, especially pertinent when considering dividing populations of cells, is to understand the cell-cycle stage of each captured cell. Here we describe and compare five established supervised machine learning methods and a custom-built predictor for allocating cells to their cell-cycle stage on the basis of their transcriptome. In particular, we assess the impact of different normalisation strategies and the usage of prior knowledge on the predictive power of the classifiers. We tested the methods on previously published datasets and found that a PCA-based approach and the custom predictor performed best. Moreover, our analysis shows that the performance depends strongly on normalisation and the usage of prior knowledge. Only by leveraging prior knowledge in form of cell-cycle annotated genes and by preprocessing the data using a rank-based normalisation, is it possible to robustly capture the transcriptional cell-cycle signature across different cell types, organisms and experimental protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464
Trapnell, C., Cacchiarelli, D., Grimsby, J., Pokharel, P., Li, S., Morse, M., Lennon, N. J., Livak, K. J., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Rinn, J. L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2859 · Cited by 7,314
Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma
Patel, A. P., Tirosh, I., Trombetta, J. J., Shalek, A. K., Gillespie, S. M., Wakimoto, H., Cahill, D. P., Nahed, B. V., Curry, W. T., Martuza, R. L., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254257 · Cited by 5,063
Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq
Zeisel, A., Muñoz-Manchado, A. B., Codeluppi, S., Lönnerberg, P., La Manno, G., Juréus, A., Marques, S., Munguba, H., He, L., Betsholtz, C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1934 · Cited by 3,124
Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer
Kastan, M. B., & Bartek, J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03097 · Cited by 2,836
Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types
Jaitin, D. A., Kenigsberg, E., Keren-Shaul, H., Elefant, N., Paul, F., Zaretsky, I., Mildner, A., Cohen, N., Jung, S., Tanay, A., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247651 · Cited by 1,795
Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics
Stegle, O., Teichmann, S. A., & Marioni, J. C. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3833 · Cited by 1,170
Self-citation
Cited by
Regev, A., Teichmann, S. A., Lander, E. S., Amit, I., Benoist, C., Birney, E., Bodenmiller, B., Campbell, P., Carninci, P., Clatworthy, M., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27041 · Cited by 2,232
Self-citationMcCarthy, D. J., Campbell, K. R., Lun, A. T. L., & Wills, Q. F. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777 · Cited by 1,852
Adams, T. S., Schupp, J. C., Poli, S., Ayaub, E. A., Neumark, N., Ahangari, F., Chu, S. G., Raby, B. A., DeIuliis, G., Januszyk, M., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba1983 · Cited by 1,420
MOFA+: a statistical framework for comprehensive integration of multi-modal single-cell data
Argelaguet, R., Arnol, D., Bredikhin, D., Deloro, Y., Velten, B., Marioni, J. C., & Stegle, O. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02015-1 · Cited by 1,091
Self-citationKathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab), Savas, P., Virassamy, B., Ye, C., Salim, A., Mintoff, C. P., Caramia, F., Salgado, R., Byrne, D. J., Teo, Z. L., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0078-7 · Cited by 992
Metadata
- Authors
- Scialdone, A., Natarajan, K. N., Saraiva, L. R., Proserpio, V., Teichmann, S. A., Stegle, O., Marioni, J. C., & Buettner, F.
- Venue
- Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 54-61
- ISSN
- 1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W836672374
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.06.021
- The paper
- Scialdone, A., Natarajan, K. N., Saraiva, L. R., Proserpio, V., Teichmann, S. A., Stegle, O., Marioni, J. C., & Buettner, F. (2015). Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome data. Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.06.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
