Cited by 401Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsGenomics and Rare DiseasesEthics in Clinical Research

Clinical research for rare disease: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions

Open access
Griggs, Robert C., Batshaw, Mark, Dunkle, Mary, Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi, Kaye, Edward, Krischer, Jeffrey, Nguyen, Tan, Paulus, Kathleen +1 more·2009·Molecular Genetics and Metabolism

Abstract

Over 7000 rare diseases, each <200,000 US residents, affect nearly 30 million people in the United States. Furthermore, for the 10% of people with a rare disease and for their families, these disorders no longer seem rare. Molecular genetics have characterized the cause of many rare diseases and provide unprecedented opportunities for identifying patients, determining phenotypes, and devising treatments to prevent, stabilize, or improve each disease. Rare disease research poses challenges to investigators requiring specific approaches to: (1) the design of clinical studies; (2) the funding of research programs; (3) the discovery, testing, and approval of new treatments, and (4) the training of clinical scientists. Rigorous, statistically-valid, natural history-controlled, cross-over, and n-of-1 trials can establish efficacy and support regulatory approval of new treatments for rare diseases. The U.S. Orphan Drug Act of the U.S. FDA has stimulated industry investment in clinical trials to develop treatments for rare diseases. For trainees interested in finding a treatment for a rare disease, a commitment to longitudinal care of patients provides a base for the characterization of phenotype and natural history, a stimulus for innovation, a target population for research and helps fund training and research. The scientific methodology, financial resources, and logistics of clinical research for rare diseases have changed dramatically in the past two decades resulting in increased understanding of the pathophysiology of these disorders and direct benefit to patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.10.003

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, but it is classified as a rare disease because its incidence rate of 3 per 100,000 people is below the rare disease definition rate of less than 10 per 100,000 people.

    “While glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor26–28, it is still classified as a “rare” disease, as its incidence rate (i.e., 3/100,000 people) is substantially lower than the rare disease definition rate (i.e., <10/100,000 people)24.”
  • Federated learning has tremendous potential in healthcare, particularly towards addressing health disparities, under-served populations, and rare diseases, by enabling machine learning models to gain knowledge from ample and diverse data that would otherwise not be available.

    “FL has tremendous potential in healthcare22,23, particularly towards addressing health disparities, under-served populations, and “rare” diseases24, by enabling ML models to gain knowledge from ample and diverse data that would otherwise not be available.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Mitsumoto J Dorsey ER Thompson J Griggs RC Impact of the Orphan Drug Act on Drug Development Presented at the Conference on Clinical Research for Rare Diseases Bethesda, MD September 5, 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griggs, R. C., Batshaw, M., Dunkle, M., Gopal-Srivastava, R., Kaye, E., Krischer, J., Nguyen, T., Paulus, K., & Merkel, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Children's National (US)
  • National Organization for Rare Disorders (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Griggs, Robert C.
Venue
Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
20-26
ISSN
1096-7192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132265655
Cited by
401
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Genetics and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54ns059065-07)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U54HL077878)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK078377)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54-NS059065)
  • National Center for Research Resources (U54RR019478, U54RR019453, U54RR019259, R13RR024337, U54RR019497, U54RR019498, U54RR019480, U54RR019397, U54RR019484)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
rare diseases, orphan drugs, Orphan Drug Act, clinical trial design, natural history research, N-of-1 trials, crossover trial, regulatory approval, drug development, clinical research funding, molecular genetics
MeSH terms
Workforce, Clinical Trials as Topic, Financing, Government, Humans, Orphan Drug Production, United States, Drug Design, Rare Diseases, Biomedical Research, Public-Private Sector Partnerships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review