Cited by 93Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenetic diversity and population structureAvian ecology and behavior

A molecular phylogeny of the harriers (Circus, Accipitridae) indicate the role of long distance dispersal and migration in diversification

Oatley, Graeme, Simmons, Robert E., Fuchs, Jérôme·2015·Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Abstract

The monophyly of the raptorial Circus genus (harriers) has never been in question, but the specific status of many, often vulnerable island endemic, taxa remains uncertain. Here we utilise one mitochondrial and three nuclear loci from all currently recognised Circus taxa (species and subspecies) to infer a robust phylogeny, to estimate the divergence date and to reconstruct the biogeographic origins of the Circus group. Our phylogeny supports both the monophyly of Circus and polyphyly of the genus Accipiter. Depending on the rate of molecular clock used, the emergence of the harrier clade took place between 4.9 and 12.2mya which coincides with the worldwide formation of open habitats which extant harriers now exploit. The sister relationship of the Northern Harrier C. cyaneus hudsonius and the Cinereous Harrier C. cinereus contradicts previous classifications that treated the former as conspecific with the Hen Harrier C. cyaneus cyaneus. Thus both should be elevated to species status: C. hudsonius and C. cyaneus. Further, the African Marsh C. ranivorus and the European Marsh C. aeruginosus Harriers emerge as sister species. The remaining marsh harriers exhibit very little genetic diversity, and are all recently diverged taxa that exhibit allopatric distributions. Considering their sister relationship and geographic proximity, we recommend treating C. approximans and C. spilonotus spilothorax as subspecies of C. approximans. For C. spilonotus spilonotus C. maillardi maillardi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.01.013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Oatley, G., Simmons, R. E., & Fuchs, J.
Affiliations
  • Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Oatley, Graeme
Venue
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
85
Pages
150-160
ISSN
1055-7903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995542145
Cited by
93
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Union Research (CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
harriers, circus, Accipitridae, molecular phylogeny, long-distance dispersal, bird migration, speciation, divergence time estimation, biogeography, monophyly, taxonomic revision, Northern Harrier, marsh harrier, subspecies status, mitochondrial and nuclear loci
MeSH terms
Animals, Bayes Theorem, DNA, Mitochondrial, Biological Evolution, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Genetic Variation, Likelihood Functions, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Ecosystem, Australasia, Falconiformes, Animal Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review