Cited by 73Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identifying unstable taxa: Efficient implementation of triplet-based measures of stability, and comparison with Phyutility and RogueNaRok

Open access
Goloboff, Pablo A., Szumik, Claudia A.·2015·Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Abstract

This paper describes an efficient implementation of triplet-based measures of stability, in the program TNT. The only available implementations of such measures are much slower than the present one, either because of an inefficient implementation (Phyutility, Thor) or because the stability is evaluated with quartets (RogueNaRok, requiring O(t(4)), instead of the O(t(3)) possible for triplets). The method to quickly calculate triplets is applied to solving IterPCR (Pol and Escapa, 2009). It is shown that, in some cases, IterPCR or other algorithms in the program TNT (e.g. commands prunnelsen, prunmajor, or chkmoves) produce more informative results than analysis with RogueNaRok.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.04.003

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The character information in the rogues can influence the relationships of the other taxa.

    “The rogue taxa were excluded from the trees when calculating the consensus; they were never excluded from the matrix in any search for optimal trees (thus, the character information in the rogues can influence the relationships of the other taxa; see [105] for a recent discussion of this problem).”
  • The rogue taxa were excluded from the trees when calculating the consensus; they were never excluded from the matrix in any search for optimal trees.

    “The rogue taxa were excluded from the trees when calculating the consensus; they were never excluded from the matrix in any search for optimal trees (thus, the character information in the rogues can influence the relationships of the other taxa; see [105] for a recent discussion of this problem).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aberer, A., 2011. Advanced Methods for Phylogenetic Post-Analysis. Master’s Thesis. Technische Universität München/Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Germany, January 2011, 77 pp.
  2. Dekker, M.C., 1986. Reconstruction Methods for Derivation Trees. Thesis submitted to the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
  3. Goloboff, 1995, A revision of the South American spiders of the family Nemesiidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae). Part I: species from Peru, Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 224, 1
  4. Mosses, C., 2005. Triplet Supertrees. Thesis presented to the Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Denmark, 6 June 2005, 94 pp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goloboff, P. A., & Szumik, C. A.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Goloboff, Pablo A.
Venue
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
88
Pages
93-104
ISSN
1055-7903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975311257
Cited by
73
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • CONICET (112 201101 00687)
  • NSF
  • NASA
  • Fundaçao de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
phylogenetic stability, TNT, computational efficiency
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Phylogeny, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review