Cited by 33Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenetic diversity and population structurePaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

Mitogenomic evidence of close relationships between New Zealand’s extinct giant raptors and small-sized Australian sister-taxa

Knapp, Michael, Thomas, Jessica E., Haile, James, Prost, Stefan, Ho, Simon Y.W., Dussex, Nicolas, Cameron-Christie, Sophia, Kardailsky, Olga +4 more·2019·Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Abstract

Prior to human arrival in the 13th century, two large birds of prey were the top predators in New Zealand. In the absence of non-volant mammals, the extinct Haast's eagle (Hieraaetus moorei), the largest eagle in the world, and the extinct Eyles' harrier (Circus teauteensis) the largest harrier in the world, had filled ecological niches that are on other landmasses occupied by animals such as large cats or canines. The evolutionary and biogeographic history of these island giants has long been a mystery. Here we reconstruct the origin and evolution of New Zealand's giant raptors using complete mitochondrial genome data. We show that both Eyles' harrier and Haast's eagle diverged from much smaller, open land adapted Australasian relatives in the late Pliocene to early Pleistocene. These events coincided with the development of open habitat in the previously densely forested islands of New Zealand. Our study provides evidence of rapid evolution of island gigantism in New Zealand's extinct birds of prey. Early Pleistocene climate and environmental changes were likely to have triggered the establishment of Australian raptors into New Zealand. Our results shed light on the evolution of two of the most impressive cases of island gigantism in the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.01.026

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Knapp, M., Thomas, J. E., Haile, J., Prost, S., Ho, S. Y. W., Dussex, N., Cameron-Christie, S., Kardailsky, O., Barnett, R., Bunce, M., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Scofield, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Canterbury Museum (NZ)
Corresponding author
Knapp, Michael
Venue
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
134
Pages
122-128
ISSN
1055-7903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913542213
Cited by
33
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society of New Zealand (14-UOO-007)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/L501694/1)
  • MTPG (681396-EXTINCTION GENOMICS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
island gigantism, mitochondrial genome, phylogenetic relationships, biogeography, Pleistocene, New Zealand, Australia, top predators
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Bayes Theorem, New Zealand, Phylogeny, Raptors, Body Size, Extinction, Biological, Genome, Mitochondrial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review