The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A two-stage poly(ethylenimine)-mediated cytotoxicity: implications for gene transfer/therapy
Open accessAbstract
Poly(ethylenimine) (PEI) is a cationic macromolecule commonly used in gene transfer/therapy protocols with high transfection efficiency both in vitro and in vivo. PEI is also cytotoxic, but the molecular basis of its cytotoxicity is poorly understood. Here, we have demonstrated that branched (25 kDa) and linear (750 kDa) PEI can both induce membrane damage and initiate apoptosis in three clinically relevant human cell lines (Jurkat T cells, umbilical vein endothelial cells, and THLE3 hepatocyte-like cells). We have defined Phase I toxicity as early necrotic-like changes (30 min) resulting from compromised membrane integrity, assessed by considerable lactate dehydrogenase release and phosphatidylserine translocation from the inner plasma membrane to the outer cell surface. Phase II cytotoxicity (24 h) was due to activation of a "mitochondrially mediated apoptotic program," resulting from PEI-induced channel formation in the outer mitochondrial membrane. This led to the release of proapoptotic cytochrome c, subsequent activation of caspase 3, and alteration in mitochondrial membrane potential as a result of caspase translocation into the mitochondria. The reported observations have important implications for the design and execution of gene therapy protocols as well for controlling intracellular distribution of drugs with cationic-based polymer-delivery systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Martin, S. J., Reutelingsperger, C. P., McGahon, A. J., Rader, J. A., van Schie, R. C., LaFace, D. M., & Green, D. R. (1995) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.182.5.1545 · Cited by 2,824
Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects
Moghimi, S. M., Hunter, A. C., & Murray, J. C. (2005) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.04-2747rev · Cited by 2,029
Self-citationLetai, A., Bassik, M. C., Walensky, L. D., Sorcinelli, M. D., Weiler, S., & Korsmeyer, S. J. (2002) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00127-7 · Cited by 1,677
Cited by
mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation
Chaudhary, N., Weissman, D., & Whitehead, K. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00283-5 · Cited by 1,555
Block copolymer micelles in nanomedicine applications
Cabral, H., Miyata, K., Osada, K., & Kataoka, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00199 · Cited by 1,309
Canton, I., & Battaglia, G. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15309b · Cited by 936
A combinatorial polymer library approach yields insight into nonviral gene delivery
Green, J. J., Langer, R., & Anderson, D. G. (2008) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar7002336 · Cited by 579
Ren, X., Feng, Y., Guo, J., Wang, H., Li, Q., Yang, J., Hao, X., Lv, J., Ma, N., & Li, W. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00483c · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Moghimi, S. M., Symonds, P., Murray, J. C., Hunter, A. C., Debska, G., & Szewczyk, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 990-995
- ISSN
- 1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995997091
- Cited by
- 1,092
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A two-stage poly(ethylenimine)-mediated cytotoxicity: implications for gene transfer/therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.02.010
- The paper
- Moghimi, S. M., Symonds, P., Murray, J. C., Hunter, A. C., Debska, G., & Szewczyk, A. (2005). A two-stage poly(ethylenimine)-mediated cytotoxicity: implications for gene transfer/therapy. Molecular Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.02.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.