Cited by 18Virus-based gene therapy researchRetinal Development and DisordersRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Encouraging and Unsettling Findings in Long-Term Follow-up of AAV Gene Transfer

Open access
Herzog, Roland W.·2020·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Gene therapy for genetic disease requires long-term therapeutic gene expression. Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are considered ideal for this task when administered to non-dividing target cells. The value of these therapies becomes obvious during long-term follow-up. A study published last year showed that substantial improvements in the vision of patients that received ocular AAV gene transfer for correction of Leber’s congenital amaurosis, a rare form of inherited blindness, were stable for at least 4 years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.01.007

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AAV viral vectors provide valuable opportunities for clinical applications in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

    “Thus, AAV viral vectors provide valuable opportunities for clinical applications in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases [5, 6].”

    From Designing and optimizing AAV-mediated gene therapy for neurodegenerative diseases: from bench to bedside (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The main text (page unavailable) describes AAV vectors as suitable for long-term gene therapy and reports clinical benefits for inherited blindness and hemophilia. It does not address treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, so it supports the general clinical potential of AAV vectors but not the disease-specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herzog, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Herzog, Roland W.
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
341-342
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999077142
Cited by
18
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
adeno-associated virus vectors, gene therapy, long-term follow-up, therapeutic gene expression, Leber congenital amaurosis, vision improvement, inherited blindness, non-dividing cells
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Organ Specificity, Genetic Therapy, Gene Expression, Gene Transfer Techniques, Transgenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review