Cited by 27Cancer Risks and FactorsGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Associations between breast cancer risk factors and religious practices in Utah

Daniels, M·2004·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Utah has the lowest female malignant breast cancer incidence rates in the United States, due in part to low rates among women who are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS or Mormon). Several established reproductive and non-reproductive breast cancer risk factors may be lower among LDS women because of their religious doctrine related to marriage, family, and health. This paper investigates the association between selected breast cancer risk factors and religious preference and religiosity in Utah.Methods A 37-item anonymous cross-sectional telephone survey was developed and conducted during March and April 2002. Results are based on 848 non-Hispanic white female respondents.Results Number of births (parity), prevalence of breastfeeding, and lifetime total duration of breastfeeding were highest among LDS women who attended church weekly. Average months of breastfeeding per child were greatest among weekly church attendees, regardless of religious preference. Oral contraceptive use and total duration of hormone replacement therapy use were greatest for individuals of any religion attending church less than weekly and for individuals with no religious preference. Comparisons of divergent reproductive behaviors between LDS and non-LDS, and between weekly and less than weekly church goers, provide strong support for the relatively low breast cancer incidence rates previously identified among LDS and, therefore, in Utah.Conclusions High parity and breastfeeding coincide with comparatively low breast cancer incidence rates among LDS and are consistent with recent findings of the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, showing the primary role parity and breastfeeding play in reducing breast cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.025

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two (7%) of the 29 studies reported a significantly worse prognosis for those who are more R/S.

    “Of those, 16 (55%) found that those who are more R/S had a lower risk of developing cancer or a better prognosis, although two (7%) reported a significantly worse prognosis [467, 468].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daniels, M.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Daniels, M
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
28-38
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975286458
Cited by
26
References
26
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
breast cancer risk factors, religiosity, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Mormon women, reproductive behavior, parity, breastfeeding, oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, church attendance, Utah
MeSH terms
Breast Feeding, Breast Neoplasms, Contraceptives, Oral, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Life Style, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Utah, Prevalence, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review