Cited by 120Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Influencing healthful food choices in school and home environments: Results from the TEENS study

Lytle, Leslie A., Kubik, Martha Y., Perry, Cheryl, Story, Mary, Birnbaum, Amanda S., Murray, David M.·2006·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background The purpose of this research is to examine the effects of an intervention designed to increase the availability of fruits, vegetables and lower fat foods in homes and schools. This research is part of the TEENS study, a school-based intervention study.Methods Sixteen schools in Minnesota were recruited to be in the study, and approximately 3600 middle school students in the eight intervention schools were exposed to a multi-component intervention. The TEENS intervention included classroom-based curricula, family newsletters, and changes in the school food environment including increasing more healthful options on a la carte and on the school lunch line. In addition to student-level outcomes, changes in availability of fruits, vegetables, and lower fat snacks in home and school environments were evaluated. The TEENS study was conducted from 1997 to 2000.Results Parents of students in intervention schools reported making healthier choices when grocery shopping as compared to parents of students in control schools (P = 0.01). No intervention effects were evident from a home food inventory. Compared to control schools, intervention schools offered (P = 0.04) and sold (P = 0.07) a higher proportion of healthier foods on a la carte, but no effects were seen for fruit and vegetables sales as part of the regular meal pattern lunch.Conclusion Our results show mixed results for positively influencing adolescents' school and home environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.020

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lytle, L. A., Kubik, M. Y., Perry, C., Story, M., Birnbaum, A. S., & Murray, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lytle, Leslie A.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
8-13
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963995738
Cited by
120
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA071943, 5R01 CA 71943-03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
school-based intervention, food environment, household food availability, school meals, fruits and vegetables, low-fat snacks, junior high school students, adolescent nutrition, grocery shopping behavior, a la carte menu
MeSH terms
Choice Behavior, Data Collection, Feeding Behavior, Health Promotion, Housing, Humans, Minnesota, Schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review