Cited by 25Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesGun Ownership and Violence ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Use of lethal means restriction counseling for suicide prevention in pediatric primary care

Bandealy, Asad, Herrera, Nicole, Weissman, Mark, Scheidt, Peter·2020·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Suicide is the second-leading cause of death for adolescents in the United States. Counseling patients and families on safe storage of firearms and medications is an effective method of suicide prevention. We sought to determine the self-reported frequency of lethal means restriction (LMR) counseling among primary care pediatric providers working with adolescents who are at risk for suicide as well as factors associated with consistently employing LMR counseling. An anonymous, self-report, electronic survey was conducted of primary care pediatricians in the Washington, DC metropolitan area of LMR counseling for suicide prevention. The survey was conducted over 10 weeks in autumn of 2017. Stepwise, multivariate logistic models were used to determine factors associated with firearm screening and LMR counseling for patients at risk for suicide. Response rate was 11% (n = 1546). Over a range of suicide risk scenarios, few respondents reported consistently screening for firearms (21.9%) or employing LMR counseling (19.4%). When adjusting for confounding, five or more years in practice was associated with higher odds of screening for firearms (aOR 4.6 [1.3-16]). Previous LMR training was strongly associated with consistent LMR counseling (aOR 8.3 [1.8-38.4]). While LMR counseling can reduce risk for completed suicide, most respondents do not consistently employ it. Those who have received training are more likely to counsel. Thus, LMR counseling should be a standard part of medical education for pediatricians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105855

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandealy, A., Herrera, N., Weissman, M., & Scheidt, P.
Affiliations
Children's National (US)
Corresponding author
Bandealy, Asad
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
130
Pages
105855
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980752510
Cited by
25
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of General Pediatrics and Community Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide prevention, pediatric primary care, adolescents, drug safety, suicide risk, pediatricians, clinician training, medical education
MeSH terms
Pediatricians, Suicide Prevention, Adult, Counseling, District of Columbia, Female, Firearms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pediatrics, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review