Cited by 22Agricultural safety and regulationsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentDye analysis and toxicity

Safety evaluation of highly-branched cyclic dextrin and a 1,4-α-glucan branching enzyme from Bacillus stearothermophilus

Choi, Sharon S.H., Danielewska-Nikiel, Barbara, Ohdan, Kohji, Kojima, Iwao, Takata, Hiroki, Kuriki, Takashi·2009·Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Abstract

Highly-branched cyclic dextrin (HBCD), a dextrin food ingredient presently only used in Japan, was investigated for digestibility and potential toxicity. HBCD was readily hydrolyzed in vitro to maltose and maltotriose by human salivary and porcine pancreatic alpha-amylases. Incubation of HBCD with a rat intestinal homogenate, containing digestive enzymes, resulted in the formation of maltose, maltotriose, and maltotetraose, and with longer incubation times, resulted in the formation of glucose. In an acute toxicity study, Wistar rats orally administered a single-dose of 2000mg/kg body weight of HBCD did not display mortality or any signs or symptoms of toxicity or abnormalities upon necropsy. Transient loose stools were observed, but were resolved within 24h of HBCD administration, and therefore, were not considered as compound-specific adverse effects. In the Ames assay, HBCD was non-mutagenic with or without metabolic activation. Toxicity testing of the branching enzyme (BE) involved in the synthesis of HBCD showed that the BE also was not acutely toxic when orally administered to rats and was non-mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma assay. The results of this study demonstrate that HBCD is digested to normal and safe products of carbohydrate digestion, and therefore, support the safety of HBCD for human consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.07.011

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, S. S. H., Danielewska-Nikiel, B., Ohdan, K., Kojima, I., Takata, H., & Kuriki, T.
Affiliations
  • Cantox Health Sciences International (CA)
  • Ezaki Glico (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Choi, Sharon S.H.
Venue
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
281-290
ISSN
0273-2300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982487514
Cited by
22
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Dye analysis and toxicity
Keywords
Bacillus stearothermophilus, food additive safety, digestibility, alpha-amylase hydrolysis, maltotriose, maltose, acute toxicity, mutagenicity, intestinal digestion
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, alpha-Amylases, Animals, Geobacillus stearothermophilus, Dextrins, Digestion, Female, Food Additives, Humans, Japan, Lymphoma, Male, Mutagenicity Tests, Pancreas, Saliva, Swine, 1,4-alpha-Glucan Branching Enzyme, Rats, Wistar, Toxicity Tests, Acute, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review