Cited by 472Psychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in MeasurementEconomic and Environmental Valuation

The method of paired comparisons for social values.

Thurstone, L. L.·1927·The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

Abstract

This is an attempt to apply the ideas of psychophysical measurement in the field of social values. Some of the psychophysical methods have been applied in a crude way to the measurement of educational products such as handwriting and English composition, and it seems feasible to apply the same ideas as well to social values although the attempt cannot readily be made without making compromises that the psychophysicist would not tolerate. The application of the principles of psychophysical measurement to educational products has been made with more or less similar logical handicaps but these do not seem to have disturbed the popularity of these methods in the field of educational measurement. Since the final results show a rather satisfactory internal consistency, one may possibly assume that the methods, the theoretically imperfect, have some value also in social psychology. For the present experiment the seriousness of different crimes or offenses was chosen for such measurement. The seriousness of an offense we shall assume to be the seriousness as judged rather than as measured in terms of objective consequences or in some normative way. Nineteen offenses were judged: abortion, adultery, arson, assault and battery, bootlegging, burglary, counterfeiting, embezzlement, forgery, homicide, kidnapping, larceny, libel, perjury, rape, receiving stolen goods, seduction, smuggling, and vagrancy. The offenses were arranged in pairs so that every one of them was paired with every other one. The total number of pairs of offenses presented was therefore n(n-1)/2 = 171. College student subjects were presented with the paired offenses and asked to choose which they considered to be the more serious crime. Results show that qualitative judgments of a rather intangible sort, loaded usually with personal opinion, bias, and even strong feeling, and regarded generally as the direct antithesis of quantitative measurement, are nevertheless amenable to the type of quantitative analysis which is associated historically with psychophysics. It is of some interest to see that a set of numerical values can be established by which the 171 observed proportions of judgments about crimes and offenses can be summarized in generalized form. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0065439

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Respondents in a 1926 survey of college students rated rape as slightly more serious than homicide.

    “Respondents in a 1926 survey of college students rated rape as slightly more serious than homicide”

    From Rape or Homicide: Which Is Worse? (2024) · cites this paper as Thurstone, 1927

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thurstone, L. L.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Thurstone, L. L.
Venue
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Published
1927-01
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
384-400
ISSN
0096-851X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075806862
Cited by
467
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
paired comparison method, social values, psychophysical measurement, crime severity, value measurement, qualitative judgment, university students, internal consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review