The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023 · cited 1×
“However, we could expect affective commitment to the organization to be more strongly related to commitment to the supervisor than commitment to the work group would be, because supervisors are representatives of the organization toward employees (Eisenberger, Fasolo, & Davis-LaMastro, 1990; Eisenberger et al., 1986)…”
BackgroundMathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827 · Cited by 3,005
Defining the 'field at a given time.'
Lewin, K. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0062738 · Cited by 1,019
Cohen, A. (1991) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1991.tb00558.x · Cited by 287
Cited by
The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies.
Riketta, M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472 · Cited by 547
Perreira, T. A., Morin, A. J. S., Hebert, M., Gillet, N., Houle, S. A., & Berta, W. (2018) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.12.004 · Cited by 130
The Benefits of Justice for Temporary Workers
Camerman, J., Cropanzano, R., & Vandenberghe, C. (2007) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601102287112 · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., & Stinglhamber, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-71
- ISSN
- 0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984670838
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00029-0
- The paper
- Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., & Stinglhamber, F. (2004). Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00029-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
