Cited by 1,019Academic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPsychology Research and BibliometricsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Defining the 'field at a given time.'

Lewin, K.·1943·Psychological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0062738

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because recursive processes take time to develop, a full understanding of them requires longitudinal research, not just the freeze-frame of a short-term measure.

    “Second, because recursive processes take time to develop, a full understanding of them requires longitudinal research, not just the freeze-frame of a short-term measure”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewin, K.
Corresponding author
Lewin, K.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1943-05
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
292-310
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2016287940
Cited by
1,019
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 52
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
field theory, psychological field

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review