The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire: Comparison with a 1-year diet record
Abstract
The validity of a self-administered semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire was evaluated for a group of 27 men and women aged 20 to 54. Intakes of 18 nutrients computed from the questionnaire were compared with those derived from 1-year diet records completed approximately 18 months earlier. The questionnaire estimates of mean nutrient intake were within 10% of the mean diet record measurements for 11 of the 18 nutrients evaluated, and the difference was less than 25% for all but one nutrient (total vitamin A). Correlation coefficients comparing unadjusted nutrient intakes measured by the two methods ranged from 0.38 (vitamin C) to more than 0.65 (total calories, total fat, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, oleic acid, and cholesterol). The overall mean of correlation coefficients comparing intakes of the 18 nutrients measured by questionnaire and by diet record was 0.60. Coefficients for macronutrients decreased somewhat after adjustment for age and gender or caloric intake. The data provide further evidence that a simple and relatively inexpensive questionnaire can provide useful information on dietary intake over an extended period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire
WILLETT, W. C., SAMPSON, L., STAMPFER, M. J., ROSNER, B., BAIN, C., WITSCHI, J., HENNEKENS, C. H., & SPEIZER, F. E. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086 · Cited by 4,274
Self-citationTotal energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.
WILLETT, W., & STAMPFER, M. J. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366 · Cited by 2,751
Self-citationA REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS
BLOCK, G. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113331 · Cited by 823
Cited by
Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires – a review
Cade, J., Thompson, R., Burley, V., & Warm, D. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2001318 · Cited by 1,423
Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records
Block, G., Woods, M., Potosky, A., & Clifford, C. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90099-b · Cited by 1,197
Dietary Assessment Methodology
Thompson, F. E., & Subar, A. F. (2017) · Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802928-2.00001-1 · Cited by 913
Ten-year outcomes of behavioral family-based treatment for childhood obesity.
Epstein, L. H., Valoski, A. M., Wing, R. R., & McCurley, J. (1994) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.13.5.373 · Cited by 874
Sleep duration as a risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes
Yaggi, H. K., Araujo, A. B., & McKinlay, J. B. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-0879 · Cited by 790
Metadata
- Authors
- Willett, W. C., Reynolds, R. D., Cottrell-Hoehner, S., Sampson, L., & Browne, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-47
- ISSN
- 0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W66416128
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire: Comparison with a 1-year diet record. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-8223(21)03057-1
- The paper
- Willett, W. C., Reynolds, R. D., Cottrell-Hoehner, S., Sampson, L., & Browne, M. L. (1987). Validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire: Comparison with a 1-year diet record. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(21)03057-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.