The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effects of variety in food choices on dietary quality
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of overall dietary variety, variety among major food groups, and variety within major food groups on dietary quality. Nutritional adequacy, one aspect of dietary quality, was measured by a Mean Adequacy Ratio (MAR)--an index of the percent of recommended intake for 11 nutrients. Other dietary quality measures included the percent of calories from fat and sugar and total intakes of energy, cholesterol, and sodium. A study sample of 3,701 individuals was selected from USDA's 1977-78 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey, excluding pregnant and lactating women and children under 1 year of age. Multiple regression analyses were performed to examine the relationships between each type of variety and each diet quality measure, controlling for age, sex, the number of foods, and all of their two-way interactions with variety. The variety terms added a significant increment to the variation in MAR that was explained by each of the models. Variety among five major food groups explained as much of the variation in MAR as did variety within those groups. Thus, dietary variety might best be defined as simply including foods from each of the major groups. Increases in this type of variety were associated with greater increases in MARs for females than for males and for persons with lower vs. higher numbers of foods. None of the types of variety could account for a sizeable proportion of the variation in the intakes of energy, fat, sugar, sodium, or cholesterol. That is, those measures were not related in any appreciable way to variety per se--either to the expansion or to the restriction of food choices. The key to limiting the intake of those constituents may be to selectively alter the scope of food choices to include more of some foods and less of others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
KENNEDY, E. T., OHLS, J., CARLSON, S., & FLEMING, K. (1995) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(95)00300-2 · Cited by 1,635
Indexes of Overall Diet Quality
KANT, A. K. (1996) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00217-9 · Cited by 650
Arimond, M., Wiesmann, D., Becquey, E., Carriquiry, A., Daniels, M. C., Deitchler, M., Fanou-Fogny, N., Joseph, M. L., Kennedy, G., Martin-Prevel, Y., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.110.123414 · Cited by 614
Hatløy, A., Torheim, L., & Oshaug, A. (1998) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600662 · Cited by 555
DIETARY DIVERSITY AS A FOOD SECURITY INDICATOR
Hoddinott, J. F., Yohannes, Y., Hoddinott, J., & Yohannes, Y. (2002) · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.15972 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Krebs-Smith, S. M., Smiciklas-Wright, H., Guthrie, H. A., & Krebs-Smith, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 897-903
- ISSN
- 0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W79911733
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of variety in food choices on dietary quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-8223(21)03212-0
- The paper
- Krebs-Smith, S. M., Smiciklas-Wright, H., Guthrie, H. A., & Krebs-Smith, J. (1987). The effects of variety in food choices on dietary quality. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(21)03212-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.