Cited by 55Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management

FRANK, ARTHUR·1998·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

The increasing perception of obesity as a disease is likely to encourage the presumption that obesity ought to be medicalized and managed in the format of a traditional disease model by the existing health care system. Many difficulties will arise from this approach because of factors such as the large numbers of affected patients, the inadequacy of health professionals' training, negative cultural views of obesity, and the inadequacy of financing (ie, health insurance) mechanisms. A series of conflicting expectations related to the services that can be provided by physicians will reinforce their reluctance to manage this disease. Much of the care of obese patients can, however, be provided by a nonphysician primary obesity care provider or team with the physician providing selected support services. Models of a modified team care system, using selected and specific nonphysician personnel and involving the patient in continuing management, may offer some new and effective options for the care of obese patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8223(98)00710-x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The addition of allied health experts to the interprofessional healthcare team either by physical colocation, distance consultation, or engagement in staff training can help to achieve higher-quality, more cost-effective care.

    “The addition of these experts to the interprofessional healthcare team either by physical colocation, distance consultation, or engagement in staff training can help to achieve higher-quality, more cost-effective care.57–63”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FRANK, A.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
FRANK, ARTHUR
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
98
Issue
10
Pages
S44-S48
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W137621475
Cited by
55
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
obesity treatment, obesity as a disease, medicalization of obesity, multidisciplinary care, team-based care, health insurance financing, health professions education, patient involvement in care
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Dietary Services, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Obesity, Patient Care Team, Physician's Role, Primary Health Care, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review