Cited by 51Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity, Physical Activity, DietDigital Mental Health Interventions

The effect of computers for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Open access
Reed, Virginia A., Schifferdecker, Karen E., Rezaee, Michael E., O’Connor, Sharon, Larson, Robin J.·2012·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background The use of computers to deliver education and support strategies has been shown to be effective in a variety of conditions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of computer-based technology on interventions for reducing weight.Methods We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov (all updated through June 2010) for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of computer-based technology on education or support interventions aimed at reducing weight in overweight or obese adults. We calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effects models.Results Eleven trials with 13 comparisons met inclusion criteria. Based on six comparisons, subjects who received a computer-based intervention as an addition to the standard intervention given to both groups lost significantly more weight (WMD -1.48 kg, 95% CI -2.52, -0.43). Conversely, based on six comparisons, subjects for whom computer-based technology was substituted to deliver an identical or highly comparable intervention to that of the control group lost significantly less weight (WMD 1.47 kg, 95% CI 0.13, 2.81). Significantly different weight loss seen in "addition" comparisons with less than six months of follow-up (WMD -1.95 kg, 95% CI -3.50, -0.40, two comparisons) was not seen in comparisons with longer follow-up (-1.08 kg, 95% CI -2.50, 0.34, four comparisons). Analyses based on quality and publication date did not substantially differ.Conclusions While the addition of computer-based technology to weight loss interventions led to statistically greater weight loss, the magnitude (<1.5 kg) was small and unsustained.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-011-1803-9

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fogg BJ. Persuasion in the digital age. In: Fogg BJ, ed. Persuasive technology: using comuters to change what we think and do. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2003:1-14.
  2. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.0 [computer program]. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.
  3. Wing RR, Hill JO. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21:323-41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reed, V. A., Schifferdecker, K. E., Rezaee, M. E., O’Connor, S., & Larson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US)
Corresponding author
Reed, Virginia A.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2011-07-30
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
99-108
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2072480095
Cited by
51
References
63
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Dartmouth College
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
computer-based intervention, weight loss, obesity, overweight adults, digital health technologies, intervention delivery mode, weight loss sustainability
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Obesity, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review