CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 175Cardiac Health and Mental HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation between myocardial infarction, depression, hostility, and death

Kaufmann, Michael W., Fitzgibbons, John P., Sussman, Elliot J., Reed, James F., Einfalt, Jeaninne M., Rodgers, Joanne K., Fricchione, Gregory L.·1999·American Heart Journal
DOI 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70159-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To examine the independent impact of major depression and hostility on mortality rate at 6 months and 12 months after discharge from the hospital in patients with a myocardial infarction.Method Three hundred thirty-one patients were prospectively evaluated for depression with a modified version of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for major depressive episode. The Cook Medley Hostility Scale data were analyzed by chi(2) procedures for nominal and categoric data, and Student t test was used for continuous data types.Results Depression was a significant predictor of death at 12 months (P =. 04) but not at 6 months (P =.08). Hostility was not found to be a predictor of death at 6 months or 12 months.Conclusions Major depression in patients hospitalized after myocardial infarction is a significant univariable predictor of death at 12 months, although it was not a statistically significant predictor after adjusting for other variables. Hostility is not a predictor of death. Prospective studies are needed to determine the impact of aggressive treatment of depression on post-myocardial infarction survival.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70159-6

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pratt, 1996, Depression, psychotropic medication, and risk of myocardial infarction, Circulation, 93, 1976

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kaufmann, M. W., Fitzgibbons, J. P., Sussman, E. J., Reed, J. F., Einfalt, J. M., Rodgers, J. K., & Fricchione, G. L.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
138
Issue
3
Pages
549-554
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70159-6
OpenAlex
W2008303229
Cited by
175
References
28
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
myocardial infarction, major depressive disorder, hostility, mortality, post-discharge survival, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hostility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Incidence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review