Cited by 50Reproductive System and PregnancyEndometriosis Research and TreatmentMenstrual Health and Disorders

The viability of the cast-off menstrual endometrium

Cron, Roland S., Gey, George·1927·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(27)90487-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The endometrium is the candidate because shredded menstrual endometrium is viable and has implantation potential.

    “The endometrium is the candidate because shredded menstrual endometrium is viable, was demonstrated in 1927 (113) and has implantation potential as demonstrated by subcutaneous injection (114) as early as 1958.”

    From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [113]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cron, R. S., & Gey, G.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1927-05
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
645-647
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1194512125
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
menstrual endometrium, endometrium, menstrual blood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review