Cited by 161Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMenstrual Health and DisordersEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus an oral contraceptive combined with very-low-dose danazol for long-term treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis

Vercellini, Paolo, De Giorgi, Olga, Oldani, Sabina, Cortesi, Ilenia, Panazza, Stefania, Crosignani, Pier Giorgio·1996·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus an oral contraceptive combined with very-low-dose danazol in the long-term treatment of pelvic pain in women with endometriosis.Study design Eighty patients with endometriosis and moderate or severe pelvic pain were randomized to treatment for 1 year with intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate 150 mg every 3 months or a cyclic monophasic oral contraceptive (ethinyl estradiol 0.02 mg, desogestrel 0.15 mg) combined with oral danazol 50 mg a day for 21 days of each 28-day cycle. The women were asked to grade the degree of their satisfaction at the end of therapy. Variations in severity of symptoms during treatment were determined by a 10 cm visual analog and a 0- to 3-point verbal rating scale.Results Twenty nine of 40 subjects (72.5%) in the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate group were satisfied after 1 year of therapy compared with 23 of 40 (57.5%) in the oral contraceptive plus danazol group (chi 2(1) = 1.37, p = 0.24, odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 4.97). A significant decrease was observed in all symptom scores in both study groups. At 1-year assessment dysmenorrhea was significantly greater in women allocated to oral contraceptive plus danazol.Conclusion Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate seems to be an effective, safe, and convenient low-cost treatment for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. However, women should be carefully counseled regarding menstrual changes and the potential prolonged delay in the return of ovulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70152-7

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vercellini, P., De Giorgi, O., Oldani, S., Cortesi, I., Panazza, S., & Crosignani, P. G.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-08
Volume
175
Issue
2
Pages
396-401
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099208499
Cited by
161
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, danazol, oral contraceptives, desogestrel, ethinyl estradiol, long-term hormonal therapy, treatment satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Danazol, Delayed-Action Preparations, Drug Therapy, Combination, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Palliative Care, Time Factors, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review