The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vaginal pH as a marker for bacterial pathogens and menopausal status
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to confirm the elevation of vaginal pH expected in patients with bacterial pathogens in premenopausal women and to examine the relationship of serum follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol levels to vaginal pH in menopausal patients without and with hormone replacement therapy. STUDY DESIGN Vaginal pH was determined by phenaphthazine (Nitrazine) pH paper in 253 patients seen in a solo private practice for routine speculum examination. None of the patients were pregnant. Measurements were made of serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol for 172 patients and vaginal cultures were taken from 82 patients. Vaginal pH was correlated with vaginal cultures and serum follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol levels by use of statistical analysis. RESULTS Vaginal pH was elevated in all premenopausal patients with documented bacterial pathogens. Serum estradiol levels showed an inverse and serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels a direct statistical correlation with vaginal pH in menopausal patients. CONCLUSIONS Measurement of vaginal pH is useful, effective, and inexpensive for screening purposes. A vaginal pH of 4.5 is consistent with a premenopausal serum estradiol level and the absence of bacterial pathogens. An elevated vaginal pH in the 5.0 to 6.5 range suggests a diagnosis of either bacterial pathogens or decreased serum estradiol. In patients with an elevated pH, vaginal culture should establish the diagnosis. In the absence of bacterial pathogens, a vaginal pH of 6.0 to 7.5 is strongly suggestive of menopause. Titration of estradiol level by vaginal pH during estrogen replacement therapy may help menopausal women avoid side effects or cessation of therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recommendations for the management of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy
Sturdee, D. W., & Panay, N. (2010) · Climacteric · doi:10.3109/13697137.2010.522875 · Cited by 527
Boskey, E. R., Telsch, K. M., Whaley, K. J., Moench, T. R., & Cone, R. A. (1999) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.67.10.5170-5175.1999 · Cited by 373
Local oestrogen for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women
Suckling, J. A., Kennedy, R., Lethaby, A., & Roberts, H. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001500.pub2 · Cited by 359
Caruso, S., Cianci, S., Vitale, S. G., Matarazzo, M. G., Amore, F. F., & Cianci, A. (2017) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000851 · Cited by 50
Scaria, J., Suzuki, H., Ptak, C. P., Chen, J.-W., Zhu, Y., Guo, X.-K., & Chang, Y.-F. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1663-5 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Caillouette, J. C., Sharp, C. F., Zimmerman, G. J., & Roy, S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1270-1277
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028585103
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaginal pH as a marker for bacterial pathogens and menopausal status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70345-4
- The paper
- Caillouette, J. C., Sharp, C. F., Zimmerman, G. J., & Roy, S. (1997). Vaginal pH as a marker for bacterial pathogens and menopausal status. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70345-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.