Cited by 121Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Molecular analysis of microdissected tumors and preneoplastic intraductal lesions in pancreatic carcinoma

Open access
Heinmöller, Ernst, Dietmaier, Wolfgang, Zirngibl, Hubert, Heinmöller, Petra, Scaringe, William, Jauch, Karl-Walter, Hofstädter, Ferdinand, Rüschoff, Josef·2000·The American Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Little or no data exist concerning the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in intraductal lesions surrounding invasive ductal pancreatic carcinomas. Using a novel improved primer extension and preamplification polymerase chain reaction, we analyzed microdissected paraffin-embedded specimens of pancreatic carcinoma (n = 29) and their corresponding pancreatic intraductal lesions (PIL, n = 331) for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of p16(INK4), DPC4, and p53 by microsatellite analysis and for p53 protein by immunohistochemistry. LOH at the p16(INK4) locus (9p21) was found in nine of 22 informative tumors (41%), in 15 of 25 tumors (60%) at the DPC4 locus (18q21.1), and in 22 of 27 tumors (81%) at the p53 locus (17p13). Homozygous deletions of p16(INK4) and DPC4 were found in eight of 22 (36%) and four of 25 tumors (16%), respectively. Furthermore, 24 of 29 tumors (83%) revealed considerable intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. In 165 of 277 PILs (60%) having suitable DNA for microsatellite analysis, alterations in at least one tumor suppressor gene were found. In individual PILs, up to three alterations were detected, and p53 LOH occurred even in morphologically normal-appearing ductal epithelium near the tumor. Although deletions of all three tumor suppressor genes were found in PILs without nuclear atypia, there was a tendency toward earlier LOH of p16(INK4) compared to DPC4 and p53 in these lesions. LOH in tumors accompanied positive p53 immunohistochemistry in 81% but only in 38% in PILs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64520-8

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • About 40% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas have both mutated TP53 and deleted ARF.

    “For example, approximately 40% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas have mutated TP53 and deleted ARF (Heinmoller, et al., 2000; Hustinx, et al., 2005; Maitra, et al., 2003).”

    From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Heinmoller, et al., 2000

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1996, 46:5-27
  2. Ru ¨schoff J, Dietmaier W, Lu ¨ttges J, Seitz G, Bocker T, Zirngibl H, Schlegel J, Schackert HK, Jauch KW, Hofsta ¨dter F: Poorly differenti- ated colonic adenocarcinoma, medullary type. Am J Pathol 1997, 150:1815-1825
  3. Bartsch D, Shevlin DW, Tung WS, Kisker O, Wells SA, Goodfellow PJ: Frequent mutations of CDKN1 in primary pancreatic adenocarcino- mas. Genes Chromosom Cancer 1995, 14:189 -195

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinmöller, E., Dietmaier, W., Zirngibl, H., Heinmöller, P., Scaringe, W., Jauch, K.-W., Hofstädter, F., & Rüschoff, J.
Affiliations
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
  • Klinikum Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author
Heinmöller, Petra
Venue
The American Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-07
Volume
157
Issue
1
Pages
83-92
ISSN
0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059330620
Cited by
121
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal Of Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, intraductal lesions, precancerous lesions, tumor suppressor, loss of heterozygosity, p16INK4, SMAD4, p53, microsatellite analysis, intratumoral genetic heterogeneity, p53 expression, 9p21, 17p13, microdissection, paraffin-embedded tissue
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreas, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Precancerous Conditions, Trans-Activators, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Microsatellite Repeats, Loss of Heterozygosity, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Smad4 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review