Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted Disruption of the FGF2 Gene Does Not Prevent Choroidal Neovascularization in a Murine Model

Open access
Tobe, Takao, Ortega, Sagrario, Luna, Jose D., Ozaki, Hiroaki, Okamoto, Naoyuki, Derevjanik, Nancy L., Vinores, Stanley A., Basilico, Claudio, Campochiaro, Peter A.·1998·The American Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the major cause of severe visual loss in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Laser treatment is helpful for a minority of patients with CNV, and development of new treatments is hampered by a poor understanding of the molecular signals involved. Several lines of evidence have suggested that basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) plays a role in stimulating CNV. In this study, we tested this hypothesis using mice with targeted disruption of the FGF2 gene in a newly developed murine model of laser-induced CNV. One week after krypton laser photocoagulation in C57BL/6J mice, 34 of 60 burns (57%) showed fluorescein leakage and 13 of 16 (81%) showed histopathological evidence of CNV. At 2 weeks, CNV was detected in 9 of 10 burns (90%) in which a bubble had been observed at the time of the laser treatment. Electron microscopy showed fenestrated vessels with large lumens within choroidal neovascular lesions. Two weeks after laser-induced rupture of Bruch's membrane, 27 of 36 burns (75%) contained CNV in FGF2-deficient mice compared with 26 of 30 (87%) in wild-type control mice, a difference that is not statistically significant. This study demonstrates that FGF2 is not required for the development of CNV after laser-induced rupture of Bruch's membrane and provides a new model to investigate molecular mechanisms and anti-angiogenic therapy in CNV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65753-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Tobe, T., Ortega, S., Luna, J. D., Ozaki, H., Okamoto, N., Derevjanik, N. L., Vinores, S. A., Basilico, C., & Campochiaro, P. A.
Venue
The American Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
153
Issue
5
Pages
1641-1646
ISSN
0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976384923
Cited by
325
References
1
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted Disruption of the FGF2 Gene Does Not Prevent Choroidal Neovascularization in a Murine Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65753-7
The paper
Tobe, T., Ortega, S., Luna, J. D., Ozaki, H., Okamoto, N., Derevjanik, N. L., Vinores, S. A., Basilico, C., & Campochiaro, P. A. (1998). Targeted Disruption of the FGF2 Gene Does Not Prevent Choroidal Neovascularization in a Murine Model. The American Journal of Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65753-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.