The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature Subset Selection by Bayesian network-based optimization
Open accessAbstract
Abstract A new method for Feature Subset Selection in machine learning, FSS-EBNA (Feature Subset Selection by Estimation of Bayesian Network Algorithm), is presented. FSS-EBNA is an evolutionary, population-based, randomized search algorithm, and it can be executed when domain knowledge is not available. A wrapper approach, over Naive-Bayes and ID3 learning algorithms, is used to evaluate the goodness of each visited solution. FSS-EBNA, based on the EDA (Estimation of Distribution Algorithm) paradigm, avoids the use of crossover and mutation operators to evolve the populations, in contrast to Genetic Algorithms. In absence of these operators, the evolution is guaranteed by the factorization of the probability distribution of the best solutions found in a generation of the search. This factorization is carried out by means of Bayesian networks. Promising results are achieved in a variety of tasks where domain knowledge is not available. The paper explains the main ideas of Feature Subset Selection, Estimation of Distribution Algorithm and Bayesian networks, presenting related work about each concept. A study about the `overfitting' problem in the Feature Subset Selection process is carried out, obtaining a basis to define the stopping criteria of the new algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Cited by
Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review
Urbanowicz, R. J., Meeker, M., La Cava, W., Olson, R. S., & Moore, J. H. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014 · Cited by 1,311
Consistency-based search in feature selection
Dash, M., & Liu, H. (2003) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00079-1 · Cited by 889
Machine learning in bioinformatics
Larrañaga, P., Calvo, B., Santana, R., Bielza, C., Galdiano, J., Inza, I., Lozano, J. A., Armañanzas, R., Santafé, G., Pérez, A., et al. (2006) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbk007 · Cited by 867
Self-citationCombined 5 × 2 cv F Test for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms
Alpaydm, E. (1999) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976699300016007 · Cited by 431
Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains
Inza, I., Larrañaga, P., Blanco, R., & Cerrolaza, A. J. (2004) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2004.01.007 · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Inza, I., Larrañaga, P., Etxeberria, R., & Sierra, B.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 157-184
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050442480
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature Subset Selection by Bayesian network-based optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0004-3702(00)00052-7
- The paper
- Inza, I., Larrañaga, P., Etxeberria, R., & Sierra, B. (2000). Feature Subset Selection by Bayesian network-based optimization. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(00)00052-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.