Cited by 16Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Reply to Steer and Beck: Panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and quantitative versus qualitative differences in anxiety assessment

Cox, Brian J., Cohen, Eva, Direnfeld, David M., Swinson, Richard P.·1996·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00060-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, B. J., Cohen, E., Direnfeld, D. M., & Swinson, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • York University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Cox, Brian J.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
34
Issue
11-12
Pages
959-961
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023107220
Cited by
16
References
10
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, applied relaxation, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety assessment, treatment efficacy, waitlist control, long-term follow-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review