Cited by 74Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Does This Patient Have Generalized Anxiety or Panic Disorder?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review

Herr, Nathaniel R., Williams, John W., Benjamin, Sophiya, McDuffie, Jennifer·2014·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: In primary care settings, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and panic disorder are common but underrecognized illnesses. Identifying accurate and feasible screening instruments for GAD and panic disorder has the potential to improve detection and facilitate treatment. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the accuracy of self-report screening instruments in diagnosing GAD and panic disorder in adults. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles published from 1980 through April 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective studies of diagnostic accuracy that compared a self-report screening instrument for GAD or panic disorder with the diagnosis made by a trained clinician using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases criteria. RESULTS: We screened 3605 titles, excluded 3529, and performed a more detailed review of 76 articles. We identified 9 screening instruments based on 13 articles from 10 unique studies for the detection of GAD and panic disorder in primary care patients Across all studies, diagnostic interviews determined that 257 of 2785 patients assessed had a diagnosis of GAD while 224 of 2637 patients assessed had a diagnosis of panic disorder. The best-performing test for GAD was the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 Item (GAD-7), with a positive likelihood ratio of 5.1 (95% CI, 4.3-6.0) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.07-0.25). The best-performing test for panic disorder was the Patient Health Questionnaire, with a positive likelihood ratio of 78 (95% CI, 29-210) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.20 (95% CI, 0.11-0.37). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Two screening instruments, the GAD-7 for GAD and the Patient Health Questionnaire for panic disorder, have good performance characteristics and are feasible for use in primary care. However, further validation of these instruments is needed because neither instrument was replicated in more than 1 primary care population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2014.5950

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 are among the best validated and most commonly used measures of depression and anxiety, respectively.

    “The Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) are among the best validated and most commonly used depression and anxiety measures, respectively.20-25”
  • A recent systematic review on diagnostic accuracy found only limited self-report measures such as GAD-7 have good performance characteristics.

    “This recent review 60 demonstrated that only limited self-reported measures of anxiety such as Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) have good performance characteristics and are promising as a case-finding instrument.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herr, N. R., Williams, J. W., Benjamin, S., & McDuffie, J.
Affiliations
  • American University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Grand River Hospital (CA)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
312
Issue
1
Pages
78
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2135859066
Cited by
74
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, screening tool, diagnostic accuracy, GAD-7, Patient Health Questionnaire, self-report questionnaire, primary care, likelihood ratios, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Primary Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Panic Disorder, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review