Effects of hunting in habitat fragments of the Atlantic forests, Brazil
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some taxa appear highly vulnerable while others seem unaffected, and populations of a few taxa may even be enhanced by hunting, typically as a function of their ecological adaptability and population biology.
“Some taxa appear highly vulnerable while others seem unaffected, and populations of a few taxa may even be enhanced by hunting (Bodmer et al. 1997, Cullen et al. 2000, Hurtado-Gonzales and Bodmer 2004, Isaac and Cowlishaw 2004, Salas and Kim 2002) -typically as a function of their ecological adaptability and population biology.”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Cullen et al. 2000
Cites
Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review
SAUNDERS, D. A., HOBBS, R. J., & MARGULES, C. R. (1991) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x · Cited by 4,110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation
Ewers, R. M., & Didham, R. K. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006949 · Cited by 2,218 · see citing works
The impact of hunting on tropical mammal and bird populations
Benítez-López, A., Alkemade, R., Schipper, A. M., Ingram, D. J., Verweij, P. A., Eikelboom, J. A. J., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaj1891 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Environmental synergisms and extinctions of tropical species
LAURANCE, W. F., & USECHE, D. C. (2009) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01336.x · Cited by 178 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cullen, L., Bodmer, R. E., & Valladares Pádua, C.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (BR)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bodmer, Richard E.
- ORCID
- Bodmer, Richard E.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-56
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140138266
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Wildlife Fund
- University of Florida
- World Resources Institute
- Center for Latin American Studies, University of Florida
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- hunting pressure, habitat fragmentation, Atlantic Forest, Tapirus, white-lipped peccary, brocket deer, armadillos, agouti, coati, species abundance, extirpation, subsistence hunting, protected areas, primate hunting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review