ATP Interaction with the Open State of the KATP Channel
Open accessAbstract
The mechanism of ATP-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channel closure by ATP is unclear, and various kinetic models in which ATP binds to open or to closed states have previously been presented. Effects of phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate (PIP2) and multiple Kir6.2 mutations on ATP inhibition and open probability in the absence of ATP are explainable in kinetic models where ATP stabilizes a closed state and interaction with an open state is not required. Evidence that ATP can in fact interact with the open state of the channel is presented here. The mutant Kir6.2[L164C] is very sensitive to Cd2+ block, but very insensitive to ATP, with no significant inhibition in 1 mM ATP. However, 1 mM ATP fully protects the channel from Cd2+ block. Allosteric kinetic models in which the channel can be in either open or closed states with or without ATP bound are considered. Such models predict a pedestal in the ATP inhibition, i.e., a maximal amount of inhibition at saturating ATP concentrations. This pedestal is predicted to occur at >50 mM ATP in the L164C mutant, but at >1 mM in the double mutant L164C/R176A. As predicted, ATP inhibits Kir6.2[L164C/R176A] to a maximum of approximately 40%, with a clear plateau beyond 2 mM. These results indicate that ATP acts as an allosteric ligand, interacting with both open and closed states of the channel.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ATP decreases the duration of KATP channel openings and increases the lifetimes of long closed states, whereas MgADP increases burst duration and reduces interburst intervals.
“ATP acts by decreasing the duration of the channel openings and increasing the lifetimes of the long closed states (132, 173, 691). Conversely, MgADP increases burst duration and reduces the interburst intervals (328).”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [173]
The Results section says that ATP alters open-time distributions in L164C/R176A channels, supporting an effect on channel opening times. The passages do not establish that openings become shorter or that long closed states last longer. The MgADP statement has a separate citation (328) and is not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Association and Stoichiometry of KATP Channel Subunits
Clement, J. P., Kunjilwar, K., Gonzalez, G., Schwanstecher, M., Panten, U., Aguilar-Bryan, L., & Bryan, J. (1997) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80321-9 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Molecular Analysis of ATP-sensitive K Channel Gating and Implications for Channel Inhibition by ATP
Trapp, S., Proks, P., Tucker, S. J., & Ashcroft, F. M. (1998) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.112.3.333 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men
Rorsman, P., & Ashcroft, F. M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2017 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
How ATP Inhibits the Open KATP Channel
Craig, T. J., Ashcroft, F. M., & Proks, P. (2008) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.200709874 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Schwanstecher, C., Neugebauer, B., Schulz, M., & Schwanstecher, M. (2002) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.s363 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Enkvetchakul, D., Loussouarn, G., Makhina, E., & Nichols, C. G.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nichols, C.G.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 719-728
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1301270
- OpenAlex
- W2103850202
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
- Keywords
- ATP-sensitive potassium channels, ATP inhibition, open state, allosteric regulation, Kir6.2, cadmium block, phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate, kinetic model
- MeSH terms
- Adenosine Triphosphate, Allosteric Regulation, Animals, Biophysics, Cadmium, Kinetics, Models, Biological, Potassium Channels, Ion Channel Gating, Point Mutation, Patch-Clamp Techniques, COS Cells, Potassium Channels, Inwardly Rectifying, Biophysical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review