The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Focal Volume Optics and Experimental Artifacts in Confocal Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) can provide a wealth of information about biological and chemical systems on a broad range of time scales (<1 micros to >1 s). Numerical modeling of the FCS observation volume combined with measurements has revealed, however, that the standard assumption of a three-dimensional Gaussian FCS observation volume is not a valid approximation under many common measurement conditions. As a result, the FCS autocorrelation will contain significant, systematic artifacts that are most severe with confocal optics when using a large detector aperture and aperture-limited illumination. These optical artifacts manifest themselves in the fluorescence correlation as an apparent additional exponential component or diffusing species with significant (>30%) amplitude that can imply extraneous kinetics, shift the measured diffusion time by as much as approximately 80%, and cause the axial ratio to diverge. Artifacts can be minimized or virtually eliminated by using a small confocal detector aperture, underfilled objective back-aperture, or two-photon excitation. However, using a detector aperture that is smaller or larger than the optimal value (approximately 4.5 optical units) greatly reduces both the count rate per molecule and the signal-to-noise ratio. Thus, there is a tradeoff between optimizing signal-to-noise and reducing experimental artifacts in one-photon FCS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains
Martin, E. W., Holehouse, A. S., Peran, I., Farag, M., Incicco, J. J., Bremer, A., Grace, C. R., Soranno, A., Pappu, R. V., & Mittag, T. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw8653 · Cited by 1,147
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy in living cells
Kim, S. A., Heinze, K. G., & Schwille, P. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1104 · Cited by 444
Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy: Past, Present, Future
Elson, E. L. (2011) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.012 · Cited by 438
Vacuum-assisted cell loading enables shear-free mammalian microfluidic culture
Kolnik, M., Tsimring, L. S., & Hasty, J. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40569e · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Hess, S. T., & Webb, W. W.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2300-2317
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986752048
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Focal Volume Optics and Experimental Artifacts in Confocal Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)73990-8
- The paper
- Hess, S. T., & Webb, W. W. (2002). Focal Volume Optics and Experimental Artifacts in Confocal Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)73990-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.