The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constrained diffusion or immobile fraction on cell surfaces: a new interpretation
Open accessAbstract
Protein lateral mobility in cell membranes is generally measured using fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR). Since the development of this technique, the data have been interpreted by assuming free Brownian diffusion of cell surface receptors in two dimensions, an interpretation that requires that a subset of the diffusing species remains immobile. The origin of this so-called immobile fraction remains a mystery. In FPR, the motions of thousands of particles are inherently averaged, inevitably masking the details of individual motions. Recently, tracking of individual cell surface receptors has identified several distinct types of motion (Gross and Webb, 1988; Ghosh and Webb, 1988, 1990, 1994; Kusumi et al. 1993; Qian et al. 1991; Slattery, 1995), thereby calling into question the classical interpretation of FPR data as free Brownian motion of a limited mobile fraction. We have measured the motion of fluorescently labeled immunoglobulin E complexed to high affinity receptors (Fc epsilon RI) on rat basophilic leukemia cells using both single particle tracking and FPR. As in previous studies, our tracking results show that individual receptors may diffuse freely, or may exhibit restricted, time-dependent (anomalous) diffusion. Accordingly, we have analyzed FPR data by a new model to take this varied motion into account, and we show that the immobile fraction may be due to particles moving with the anomalous subdiffusion associated with restricted lateral mobility. Anomalous subdiffusion denotes random molecular motion in which the mean square displacements grow as a power law in time with a fractional positive exponent less than one. These findings call for a new model of cell membrane structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Precise Nanometer Localization Analysis for Individual Fluorescent Probes
Thompson, R. E., Larson, D. R., & Webb, W. W. (2002) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75618-x · Cited by 2,320
Self-citationMetzler, R., Jeon, J.-H., Cherstvy, A. G., & Barkai, E. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp03465a · Cited by 1,765
Kusumi, A., Nakada, C., Ritchie, K., Murase, K., Suzuki, K., Murakoshi, H., Kasai, R. S., Kondo, J., & Fujiwara, T. (2005) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.34.040204.144637 · Cited by 1,122
Analysis of Binding Reactions by Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching
Sprague, B. L., Pego, R. L., Stavreva, D. A., & McNally, J. G. (2004) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.103.026765 · Cited by 616
A Biological Interpretation of Transient Anomalous Subdiffusion. I. Qualitative Model
Saxton, M. J. (2007) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.092619 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Feder, T. J., Brust-Mascher, I., Slattery, J. P., Baird, B., & Webb, W. W.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2767-2773
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002478108
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constrained diffusion or immobile fraction on cell surfaces: a new interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79846-6
- The paper
- Feder, T. J., Brust-Mascher, I., Slattery, J. P., Baird, B., & Webb, W. W. (1996). Constrained diffusion or immobile fraction on cell surfaces: a new interpretation. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79846-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.