Cited by 2,320Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications

Precise Nanometer Localization Analysis for Individual Fluorescent Probes

Open access
Thompson, Russell E., Larson, Daniel R., Webb, Watt W.·2002·Biophysical Journal

Abstract

Calculation of the centroid of the images of individual fluorescent particles and molecules allows localization and tracking in light microscopes to a precision about an order of magnitude greater than the microscope resolution. The factors that limit the precision of these techniques are examined and a simple equation derived that describes the precision of localization over a wide range of conditions. In addition, a localization algorithm motivated from least-squares fitting theory is constructed and tested both on image stacks of 30-nm fluorescent beads and on computer-generated images (Monte Carlo simulations). Results from the algorithm show good agreement with the derived precision equation for both the simulations and actual images. The availability of a simple equation to describe localization precision helps investigators both in assessing the quality of an experimental apparatus and in directing attention to the factors that limit further improvement. The precision of localization scales as the inverse square root of the number of photons in the spot for the shot noise limited case and as the inverse of the number of photons for the background noise limited case. The optimal image magnification depends on the expected number of photons and background noise, but, for most cases of interest, the pixel size should be about equal to the standard deviation of the point spread function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75618-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only molecules localized with an x-y precision <10 nm, fitting R2 > 0.6, and comprising >200 photons were used for further analysis.

    “Only molecules localized with an x-y precision <10 nm37, fitting R2 > 0.6, and comprising >200 photons were used for further analysis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, R. E., Larson, D. R., & Webb, W. W.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Webb, Watt W.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
2775-2783
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062552264
Cited by
2,320
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 143 · 2017: 157 · 2016: 123 · 2015: 153 · 2014: 195 · 2013: 164 · 2012: 158
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 08267, GM 08210, T32GM008210)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR004224, P41RR04224)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
single-molecule localization, centroid calculation, least squares fitting, shot noise, background noise, photon statistics, point spread function, image magnification, fluorescent microspheres, Monte Carlo simulation, single-particle tracking
MeSH terms
Fluorescent Dyes, Sensitivity and Specificity, Normal Distribution, Least-Squares Analysis, Photons, Microscopy, Confocal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review