Cited by 98Epilepsy research and treatmentNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Delayed kindling epileptogenesis and increased neurogenesis in adult rats housed in an enriched environment

Auvergne, Romane, Leré, Carole, El Bahh, Bouchaı̈b, Arthaud, Sébastien, Lespinet, Véronique, Rougier, Alain, Le Gal La Salle, Gildas·2002·Brain Research

Abstract

Environmental risk factors such as stressful experiences have long been recognized to affect seizure susceptibility, but little attention has been paid to the potential effects of improving housing conditions. In this study, we investigated the influence of an enriched environment on epileptogenesis. Epileptic susceptibility was assessed in animals housed in an enriched environment either before and during (group I) or only during (group II) a kindling procedure and in animals placed in isolated conditions (group III). The kindling paradigm provides a reliable assessment of the capacity to develop seizures following repeated daily low-frequency electrical stimulations. As both enriched environment and seizures are known to interfere with hippocampal neurogenesis, the number of newly generated dentate cells was assessed before and after the kindling procedure to investigate in more detail the relationship between epileptogenesis and neurogenesis. We found that susceptibility to developing epilepsy differed in animals housed in complex enriched environments and in those housed in isolated conditions. Kindling epileptogenesis occurred significantly later in animals housed in enriched conditions throughout the procedure (group I) than in animals from groups II and III. We also demonstrated that cells generated during kindling survived for at least 42 days and that these cells were more numerous on both sides of the brain following environmental enrichment than in rats housed in i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03355-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Environmental enrichment reduces susceptibility to epilepsy.

    “Environmental enrichment | Reduces anxiety [196,197], stress [196,197], and abnormal repetitive behaviour [198–200]. Reduces susceptibility to epilepsy [201] and osteoarthritis [202] and modifies the pathology of neurological disorders [203]. Increases foraging behaviour in fish [204].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auvergne, R., Leré, C., El Bahh, B., Arthaud, S., Lespinet, V., Rougier, A., & Le Gal La Salle, G.
Affiliations
Université de Bordeaux (FR)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
954
Issue
2
Pages
277-285
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024397074
Cited by
98
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
kindling, epileptogenesis, environmental enrichment, hippocampal neurogenesis, dentate gyrus, seizure susceptibility, isolation, epilepsy risk factors
MeSH terms
Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Environment, Controlled, Epilepsy, Hippocampus, Housing, Animal, Immunohistochemistry, Kindling, Neurologic, Male, Neurons, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review