Electrical stimulation of the cingulum bundle and surrounding cortical tissue reduces formalin-test pain in the rat
Open accessAbstract
Surgical lesions of the cingulum bundle in humans produce marked decreases in severe pain associated with cancer, reflex sympathetic dystrophy and other forms of chronic pain. Similarly, a temporary block of the anterior cingulum bundle in the rat by microinjection of lidocaine produces significant decreases in formalin-pain and reduces autotomy following peripheral neurectomy. The present study explored the effect of electrical stimulation of the cingulum bundle/surrounding cortical tissue (CB/CT) on tonic pain in the rat. Experiment 1 examined changes in formalin-induced pain responses following a 2.5-min period (30 s/min for 5 min) of electrical stimulation of the CB/CT 15 min prior to the formalin injection. The stimulation produced a significant reduction of first-period and second-period pain responses. Experiment 2 examined changes in formalin-induced pain responses following a 2.5-min period (30 s/min for 5 min) of electrical stimulation of the CB/CT 20 min following the formalin injection. The stimulation produced a dramatic reduction in second-period pain responses which persisted for the duration of the 35-min post-stimulation test period. The fact that either electrical stimulation or surgical section of the CB/CT produces pain relief suggests that this region serves a complex role in pain processing. Since the cingulum bundle has major connections with all other structures of the limbic system, it is possible that electrical stimulation disrupts patterned activity in the system, which is known to play an especially important role in the affective-motivational dimension of pain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrical stimulation of the cingulum bundle reduces formalin-test pain.
“The finding that electrical stimulation of the cingulum bundle reduces formalin-test pain (Fuchs et al., 1996) was interpreted as a disruption of patterned activity that would normally signal pain.”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Fuchs et al., 1996
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A PROPOSED MECHANISM OF EMOTION
PAPEZ, J. W. (1937) · Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1937.02260220069003 · Cited by 3,563 · see citing works
Stereotaxic anterior cingulotomy for neuropsychiatric illness and intractable pain
Ballantine, H. T., Cassidy, W. L., Flanagan, N. B., & Marino, R. (1967) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1967.26.5.0488 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction
Bubb, E. J., Metzler-Baddeley, C., & Aggleton, J. P. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.008 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
“The finding that electrical stimulation of the cingulum bundle reduces formalin-test pain (Fuchs et al., 1996) was interpreted as a disruption of patterned activity that would normally signal pain.”
Morphological and functional reorganization of rat medial prefrontal cortex in neuropathic pain
Metz, A. E., Yau, H.-J., Centeno, M. V., Apkarian, A. V., & Martina, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809897106 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Kwan, C. L., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., & Davis, K. D. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00287-0 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fuchs, P. N., Balinsky, M., & Melzack, R.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fuchs, Perry N
- ORCID
- Fuchs, Perry N
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 743
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 116-123
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073626858
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McGill University
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (A7891)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- cingulum, electrical stimulation, formalin-induced pain, tonic pain, chronic pain, anterior cingulate cortex, pain modulation, autotomy, neurectomy, limbic system, pain processing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Gyrus Cinguli, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review