Cited by 14Nerve injury and regenerationSpinal Cord Injury ResearchNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Reinnervation of denervated muscle by transplantation of fetal spinal cord to transected sciatic nerve in the rat

Katsuki, Masatoshi, Atsuta, Yuji, Hirayama, Takakazu·1997·Brain Research

Abstract

When motor neurons in the spinal cord are destroyed, regeneration of motor axons and muscle reinnervation cannot be expected. We attempted reinnervation of the denervated muscle, i.e. motor unit reconstruction, using transplantation of the fetal spinal cord to the peripheral nerve. The sciatic nerve of an adult rat was resected for 20 mm, and a cavity was prepared using an autologous femoral vein at the distal stump of the nerve. The fetal spinal cord was then transplanted into the venous cavity. After 3-6 months, no voluntary muscle contraction was observed due to the absence of communication with the central nervous system. However, reinnervation of the muscles via the sciatic nerve by the transplanted spinal neurons was demonstrated electrophysiologically and histochemically. This suggested that a motor unit can be reconstructed by fetal spinal cord transplantation even if the original motor neurons in the spinal cord are not available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00675-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reinnervation of the gastrocnemius and tibialis muscles via the distal stump of the sciatic nerve was observed after a few weeks, although there was no communication with the CNS.

    “Reinnervation of the gastrocnemius and tibialis muscles via the distal stump of the sciatic nerve was observed after a few weeks, although there was no communication with the CNS.”
  • An animal model for a biohybrid approach to cure flaccid paralysis involves transplanting embryonic spinal cord cells into a container adapted to the distal nerve stump to restore skeletal muscle function.

    “researchers have developed an animal model for a biohybrid approach to cure flaccid paralysis that involves embryonic spinal cord cell transplantation into a container adapted to the distal nerve stump to restore skeletal muscle function (Katsuki et al., 1997; Thomas et al., 2000; Klinge et al., 2001b)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katsuki, M., Atsuta, Y., & Hirayama, T.
Affiliations
Asahikawa Medical College Hospital (JP)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-10
Volume
771
Issue
1
Pages
31-36
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077802662
Cited by
14
References
0
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education (07807135)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
muscle reinnervation, denervated muscle, fetal spinal cord transplantation, sciatic nerve transection, motor neuron degeneration, motor axon regeneration, peripheral nerve regeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Electric Stimulation, Femoral Vein, Motor Neurons, Muscle Denervation, Muscle, Smooth, Vascular, Nerve Regeneration, Neuromuscular Junction, Peroneal Nerve, Sciatic Nerve, Spinal Cord, Tibial Nerve, Transplantation, Autologous, Fetal Tissue Transplantation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review