Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 568

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-precision analysis of Pb isotope ratios by multi-collector ICP-MS

Open access
White, William M, Albarède, Francis, Télouk, Philippe·2000·Chemical Geology

Abstract

We investigated high-precision Pb isotope ratio analysis by multi-collector-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS) using added thallium as an internal isotopic standard to correct for mass dependent isotopic fractionation. We compared MC-ICP-MS analysis of both an inter-laboratory standard, NBS 981, and geological samples to conventional thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS). As expected, we found that analytical error in the latter was dominated by mass fractionation. In MC-ICP-MS, we found that fractionation appears to follow the exponential law, but that the fractionation coefficients, f, of Tl and Pb were not identical. This difference in fractionation coefficients cannot be compensated for by renormalizing to a different Tl isotopic composition as done in other studies. We found, however, that the fPb/fTl ratio was constant over the course of an analytical session, allowing fPb to be calculated from fTl. An exponential law correction was then applied to the Pb isotope measurements which effectively eliminates errors associated with mass fractionation. Precision for the MC-ICP-MS analyses ranged from a factor of 2 to a factor of 6 better than for TIMS analyses for the 206Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/206Pb ratios respectively. Residual error in the MC-ICP-MS analyses was dominated by error in the analysis of 204Pb, perhaps in part due to random errors introduced by correcting for a 204Hg isobaric interference. We also found systematic errors in the MC-ICP-MS analyses compared to TIMS determinations that may be due to uneven background and collector biases in the instrument used. We found that these systematic errors were the same for both NBS 981 and the geological samples, so accurate correction factors could be generated from the standard analyses to correct the sample analyses. MC-ICP-MS has the additional advantages of requiring less preparative chemistry, less instrument time, and considerably less labor overall.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00182-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 568

Metadata

Authors
White, W. M., Albarède, F., & Télouk, P.
Venue
Chemical Geology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
167
Issue
3-4
Pages
257-270
ISSN
0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972359411
Cited by
568
References
1
FWCI
16.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-precision analysis of Pb isotope ratios by multi-collector ICP-MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00182-5
The paper
White, W. M., Albarède, F., & Télouk, P. (2000). High-precision analysis of Pb isotope ratios by multi-collector ICP-MS. Chemical Geology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00182-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.